Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Roepman Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Roepman Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Roepman Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Roepman Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:27 | 42:09 to 38:42 | 70.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:36 | 02:27 to 01:51 | 12.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:14 | 02:38 to 02:24 | 4.8% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 04:47 to 04:34 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:26 to 04:14 | 4.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:10 | 05:29 to 05:19 | 3.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 04:22 to 04:20 | 0.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Roepman Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 03:36 | 04:20 +00:06 | 04:20 -00:44 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 08:02 | 04:40 +00:22 | 08:40 -00:38 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 13:04 | 02:41 -00:03 | 13:20 -00:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 15:42 | 05:03 +00:22 | 16:01 -00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 03:53 | 21:07 | 04:28 -00:35 | 21:04 +00:03 |
| Running 4 | 05:24 | 25:00 | 05:02 +00:22 | 25:32 -00:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:22 | 30:24 | 04:45 -00:23 | 30:34 -00:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 34:46 | 05:11 +00:21 | 35:19 -00:33 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 40:18 | 04:40 +00:07 | 40:30 -00:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:32 | 45:05 | 05:04 +00:28 | 45:10 -00:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:27 | 50:37 | 02:01 +00:26 | 50:14 +00:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:47 | 53:04 | 05:03 +00:44 | 52:15 +00:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:55 | 58:51 | 04:37 -00:42 | 57:18 +01:33 |
| Running 8 | 05:56 | 01:02:46 | 05:31 +00:25 | 01:01:55 +00:51 |
| Wall Balls | 05:29 | 01:08:42 | 05:49 -00:20 | 01:07:26 +01:16 |
| Roxzone | 05:14 | 01:19:15 | 06:00 -00:46 | 01:19:15 |
Kevin Roepman delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, achieving an overall rank of 653, placing him in the top 20% of all participants. Within his age group, he ranked 125th, demonstrating a competitive edge. His overall time of 1:19:15 highlighted his proficiency and commitment. However, his total running time of 42:09 suggests a slight lag, being 1:52 slower than the average, indicating potential for improvement in endurance and pacing. Kevin's running strategy showed a fast start with Running 1 being significantly quicker than average, but subsequent laps demonstrated a slower pace. This suggests an initial burst that may have led to fatigue, affecting later running segments. His performance indicates a hybrid athlete profile, with strengths evident in both running and strength exercises, though there's room for enhancing his running efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Nick | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:05 | |
| Gauthier Aurelien | 2024 Marseille | 01:18:56 | |
| Doyle Daniel | 2024 Poznan | 01:19:00 | |
| Cook Graeme | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:48 | |
| Stacey Liam | 2023 Dubai | 01:19:03 | |
| Fourie Wynand | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:19:32 | |
| Purchase Mal | 2024 London | 01:19:31 | |
| Mcinerney Craig | 2024 Dublin | 01:19:07 | |
| Breeze Daniel | 2023 London | 01:19:16 | |
| Tipelu Tohemotu | 2024 Melbourne | 01:19:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
