Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jones Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jones Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jones Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jones Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:59 | 06:16 to 05:17 | 35.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:36 | 04:53 to 04:17 | 21.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:29 | 04:35 to 04:06 | 17.4% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 04:49 to 04:33 | 9.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:03 to 01:50 | 7.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:10 | 02:33 to 02:23 | 6.0% |
| Run Total | 00:04 | 38:35 to 38:31 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Jones Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:41 | 00:00 | 04:20 +00:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:58 | 04:41 | 04:20 -00:22 | 04:20 +00:21 |
| Running 2 | 04:19 | 08:39 | 04:39 -00:20 | 08:40 -00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:33 | 12:58 | 02:41 -00:08 | 13:19 -00:21 |
| Running 3 | 04:41 | 15:31 | 05:02 -00:21 | 16:00 -00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 20:12 | 04:28 +00:07 | 21:02 -00:50 |
| Running 4 | 04:44 | 24:47 | 05:01 -00:17 | 25:30 -00:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:53 | 29:31 | 04:43 +00:10 | 30:31 -01:00 |
| Running 5 | 05:07 | 34:24 | 05:10 -00:03 | 35:14 -00:50 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 39:31 | 04:40 +00:09 | 40:24 -00:53 |
| Running 6 | 04:48 | 44:20 | 05:03 -00:15 | 45:04 -00:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 49:08 | 02:01 +00:02 | 50:07 -00:59 |
| Running 7 | 04:59 | 51:11 | 05:02 -00:03 | 52:08 -00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:11 | 56:10 | 04:36 -00:25 | 57:10 -01:00 |
| Running 8 | 05:20 | 01:00:21 | 05:30 -00:10 | 01:01:46 -01:25 |
| Wall Balls | 06:16 | 01:05:41 | 05:47 +00:29 | 01:07:16 -01:35 |
| Roxzone | 07:18 | 01:19:05 | 06:02 +01:16 | 01:19:05 |
Overall, Nick Jones put in a commendable performance at the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, placing within the top 20% of all athletes and the top 25% in his age group. He demonstrated strength in his running ability, with his total running time being 01:29 faster than average. This suggests Nick has a strong runner profile. However, his pacing could use some improvement, particularly at the beginning of the race, as evidenced by his first run being 00:20 slower than average. This suggests that Nick started off a bit too slowly, but was able to compensate in the later stages of the race.
During the race, Nick should aim for a quicker start, particularly in the first running segment. While maintaining a faster pace, he should also conserve energy for the later stages of the race. Transition times between exercises need to be swift, so practicing these transitions during training could be beneficial. Given his strength in running, focusing on maintaining a strong pace during the running segments could help improve his overall time. In the strength-based exercises, he should aim for a steady rhythm and ensure proper form to maximize efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Campoy Luis | 2024 Madrid | 01:18:51 | |
| Mcshane Declan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:46 | |
| Telidis Billy | 2024 Anaheim | 01:19:15 | |
| Istel Stephane | 2024 Taipei | 01:19:32 | |
| Theisen Markus | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:18:51 | |
| Gilali Petter | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:19:07 | |
| Cannon Tom | 2023 Manchester | 01:18:45 | |
| Hellberg Franz | 2024 Stockholm | 01:19:31 | |
| Büscher Philipp | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:19:00 | |
| Nauerth Martin | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:19:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:23:15 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:23:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
