Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nijkamp Dennis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nijkamp Dennis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nijkamp Dennis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nijkamp Dennis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:38 | 47:39 to 43:01 | 91.4% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:01 to 04:49 | 3.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 05:03 to 04:53 | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:31 to 04:27 | 1.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:39 to 02:39 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:19 to 05:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Nijkamp Dennis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:57 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 03:57 | 04:29 +00:02 | 04:46 -00:49 |
| Running 2 | 05:36 | 08:28 | 05:06 +00:30 | 09:15 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 14:04 | 02:59 -00:20 | 14:21 -00:17 |
| Running 3 | 05:58 | 16:43 | 05:33 +00:25 | 17:20 -00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 05:03 | 22:41 | 05:07 -00:04 | 22:53 -00:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:59 | 27:44 | 05:33 +00:26 | 28:00 -00:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:19 | 33:43 | 05:38 -00:19 | 33:33 +00:10 |
| Running 5 | 06:28 | 39:02 | 05:43 +00:45 | 39:11 -00:09 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 45:30 | 04:53 +00:08 | 44:54 +00:36 |
| Running 6 | 06:06 | 50:31 | 05:35 +00:31 | 49:47 +00:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 56:37 | 02:15 -00:27 | 55:22 +01:15 |
| Running 7 | 06:26 | 58:25 | 05:33 +00:53 | 57:37 +00:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:25 | 01:04:51 | 05:22 -00:57 | 01:03:10 +01:41 |
| Running 8 | 07:12 | 01:09:16 | 06:14 +00:58 | 01:08:32 +00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 05:15 | 01:16:28 | 06:47 -01:32 | 01:14:46 +01:42 |
| Roxzone | 07:08 | 01:28:46 | 07:13 -00:05 | 01:28:46 |
Dennis Nijkamp's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race was commendable, placing him in the top 40% overall and top 30% in his age group. This indicates a solid performance among his peers. A key observation is that Dennis has a strong balance between running and strength, though his overall running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting he may benefit from additional focus on running endurance and speed.
His initial running segments showed a strong start, particularly in Running 1, where he was significantly faster than average, indicating he might have started out too fast. However, his pace decreased in subsequent runs, which suggests a need for better pacing strategies.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Goossens Anthony | 2024 Maastricht | 01:28:56 | |
| Barr Daniel | 2023 Madrid | 01:28:18 | |
| Jones James | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:55 | |
| Crabtree Dan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:29:07 | |
| Frost Dan | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:29:11 | |
| Meinke Matthias | 2019 Hamburg | 01:28:39 | |
| Faltin Stefan | 2024 Katowice | 01:28:26 | |
| Howell Brock | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:29:13 | |
| Szuch Jeremy | 2020 Chicago | 01:28:56 | |
| Fuchs Sascha | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:28:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:35:36 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
