Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mulders Marcel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mulders Marcel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mulders Marcel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mulders Marcel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:45 | 43:14 to 41:29 | 52.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:12 | 06:00 to 04:48 | 35.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 05:19 to 04:58 | 10.4% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:46 to 04:43 | 1.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:27 to 02:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:47 to 03:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:40 to 01:40 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:01 to 06:01 | 0.0% |
| Mulders Marcel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:35 | 00:00 | 04:35 -01:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 03:35 | 04:26 -00:16 | 04:35 -01:00 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 07:45 | 04:55 +00:21 | 09:01 -01:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:27 | 13:01 | 02:51 -00:24 | 13:56 -00:55 |
| Running 3 | 05:39 | 15:28 | 05:22 +00:17 | 16:47 -01:19 |
| Sled Pull | 03:47 | 21:07 | 04:53 -01:06 | 22:09 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 24:54 | 05:20 +00:16 | 27:02 -02:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:19 | 30:30 | 05:16 +00:03 | 32:22 -01:52 |
| Running 5 | 05:40 | 35:49 | 05:30 +00:10 | 37:38 -01:49 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 41:29 | 04:48 -00:02 | 43:08 -01:39 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 46:15 | 05:22 +00:15 | 47:56 -01:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:40 | 51:52 | 02:10 -00:30 | 53:18 -01:26 |
| Running 7 | 05:51 | 53:32 | 05:21 +00:30 | 55:28 -01:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:00 | 59:23 | 05:03 +00:57 | 01:00:49 -01:26 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:05:23 | 05:57 +00:06 | 01:05:52 -00:29 |
| Wall Balls | 06:01 | 01:11:26 | 06:27 -00:26 | 01:11:49 -00:23 |
| Roxzone | 07:40 | 01:25:00 | 06:44 +00:56 | 01:25:00 |
Marcel Mulders showcased a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox, finishing in the top third of both overall and age group categories. His strength segments, particularly the Sled Push and Sled Pull, were significantly faster than average, indicating strong proficiency in strength-based tasks. However, his overall running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting that running endurance is an area for improvement. Marcel's pacing strategy appeared to be aggressive at the start, with a notably fast Running 1 segment, but gradually slowed down in subsequent running segments. This indicates a potential need for better pacing to maintain consistent performance throughout the race. Based on his results, Marcel seems to have a hybrid profile, with room for improvement in both running endurance and transition efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gilbert Steve | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:51 | |
| Loison Enzo | 2024 Marseille | 01:25:17 | |
| Duthoit Gregory | 2024 Köln | 01:25:23 | |
| Groombridge Jon | 2024 Maastricht | 01:25:00 | |
| Marshall Gary | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:43 | |
| McCormack Calum | 2024 Stockholm | 01:25:11 | |
| Austin Ross | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:35 | |
| Cook David | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:46 | |
| Corry Jack | 2022 London | 01:24:36 | |
| Hegarty Noel | 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
