Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mensink Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mensink Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mensink Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mensink Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:06 | 37:37 to 34:31 | 67.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:40 | 04:17 to 03:37 | 14.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:21 | 04:48 to 04:27 | 7.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:20 | 03:46 to 03:26 | 7.2% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:29 to 04:20 | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:35 to 01:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:28 to 03:28 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:26 to 01:26 | 0.0% |
| Mensink Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:02 | 00:00 | 03:57 -00:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:56 | 03:02 | 04:11 -00:15 | 03:57 -00:55 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 06:58 | 04:13 +00:39 | 08:08 -01:10 |
| Sled Push | 01:35 | 11:50 | 02:26 -00:51 | 12:21 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 04:50 | 13:25 | 04:31 +00:19 | 14:47 -01:22 |
| Sled Pull | 03:28 | 18:15 | 03:57 -00:29 | 19:18 -01:03 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 21:43 | 04:30 +00:20 | 23:15 -01:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:46 | 26:33 | 03:58 -00:12 | 27:45 -01:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:17 | 30:19 | 04:37 +00:40 | 31:43 -01:24 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 35:36 | 04:27 +00:02 | 36:20 -00:44 |
| Running 6 | 04:51 | 40:05 | 04:32 +00:19 | 40:47 -00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:26 | 44:56 | 01:48 -00:22 | 45:19 -00:23 |
| Running 7 | 04:38 | 46:22 | 04:32 +00:06 | 47:07 -00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:17 | 51:00 | 04:00 +00:17 | 51:39 -00:39 |
| Running 8 | 05:20 | 55:17 | 04:49 +00:31 | 55:39 -00:22 |
| Wall Balls | 04:48 | 01:00:37 | 04:59 -00:11 | 01:00:28 +00:09 |
| Roxzone | 05:08 | 01:10:24 | 04:57 +00:11 | 01:10:24 |
Nick Mensink delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 6% overall and top 7% in his age group. His overall time of 01:10:24 showcases his strong competitive spirit. Notably, Nick excelled in strength-based exercises like the Sled Push and Farmers Carry, indicating a robust strength profile. However, he faced challenges in maintaining consistent running times, with his total running time being 1:33 slower than the average. His initial running segments suggest a fast start, but subsequent running times indicate a struggle to maintain that pace, hinting at a need for improved endurance and pacing strategy. His Roxzone time also suggests room for improvement in transitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiedler Julian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:10:36 | |
| Van Aalst Sebastiaan | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:10:53 | |
| Lecieux Thomas | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:10:51 | |
| Alleau Guillaume | 2024 Marseille | 01:09:56 | |
| Edmondson Dominic | 2024 Incheon | 01:09:55 | |
| Chen Jin Long | 2024 Singapore | 01:10:41 | |
| Moritz Wanja | 2024 Hamburg | 01:10:36 | |
| Brenchley Jamie | 2023 London | 01:10:11 | |
| Kühn Philipp | 2022 Hamburg | 01:10:31 | |
| Soonieus Mike | 2024 Maastricht | 01:10:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Amsterdam | 01:16:20 | |
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:15:31 | |
| 2022 Maastricht | 01:19:34 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
