Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcredmond Lachlan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcredmond Lachlan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcredmond Lachlan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcredmond Lachlan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:04 | 39:37 to 36:33 | 74.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:22 | 04:14 to 03:52 | 8.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 04:07 to 03:47 | 8.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 01:56 to 01:42 | 5.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:14 to 04:08 | 2.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:42 to 03:42 | 0.0% |
| Mcredmond Lachlan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:48 | 00:00 | 04:11 +00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 04:48 | 04:16 -00:02 | 04:11 +00:37 |
| Running 2 | 04:41 | 09:02 | 04:27 +00:14 | 08:27 +00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 13:43 | 02:34 -00:23 | 12:54 +00:49 |
| Running 3 | 04:52 | 15:54 | 04:50 +00:02 | 15:28 +00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 04:07 | 20:46 | 04:13 -00:06 | 20:18 +00:28 |
| Running 4 | 04:54 | 24:53 | 04:47 +00:07 | 24:31 +00:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:14 | 29:47 | 04:22 -00:08 | 29:18 +00:29 |
| Running 5 | 04:56 | 34:01 | 04:55 +00:01 | 33:40 +00:21 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 38:57 | 04:34 -00:10 | 38:35 +00:22 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 43:21 | 04:49 +00:10 | 43:09 +00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 48:20 | 01:55 +00:01 | 47:58 +00:22 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 50:16 | 04:48 +00:23 | 49:53 +00:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:57 | 55:27 | 04:21 -00:24 | 54:41 +00:46 |
| Running 8 | 05:21 | 59:24 | 05:11 +00:10 | 59:02 +00:22 |
| Wall Balls | 03:42 | 01:04:45 | 05:25 -01:43 | 01:04:13 +00:32 |
| Roxzone | 06:52 | 01:15:10 | 05:32 +01:20 | 01:15:10 |
Lachlan Mcredmond delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 194 out of 1801 athletes, placing him in the top 10%. Within his age group (30-34), Lachlan ranked 54th out of 406, situating him in the top 13%. His overall time was 01:15:10, showcasing his capability in both running and strength exercises. Notably, Lachlan's total running time was 00:39:37, which was 01:16 slower than the average, indicating a hybrid profile with room for improvement in both areas. His pacing was fairly consistent, though he started a bit slower and maintained a steady pace through the first four running segments. Lachlan's strength was evident in exercises like the Wall Balls, where he finished significantly faster than average, placing in the 1st percentile.
By focusing on these areas, Lachlan can enhance his performance in future races, turning his current weaknesses into strengths.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lewis Matt | 2022 London | 01:15:20 | |
| Burns Ricky | 2024 Glasgow | 01:15:09 | |
| Brown Shaun | 2023 Birmingham | 01:14:48 | |
| Healy Matt | 2023 London | 01:15:38 | |
| Mcnulty Seamus | 2024 London | 01:14:55 | |
| Alig Benjamin | 2022 Bremen | 01:15:21 | |
| Potočnik Matjaz | 2024 Katowice | 01:14:51 | |
| Wong Wai Yuin | 2024 Singapore | 01:15:19 | |
| Moran Paul | 2024 Dublin | 01:14:50 | |
| Schick Carsten | 2021 Hamburg | 01:15:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:39:07 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
