Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 323 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcguckin Chris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcguckin Chris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcguckin Chris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcguckin Chris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 03:36 | 10:43 to 07:07 | 70.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:57 | 05:56 to 04:59 | 18.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:28 | 06:05 to 05:37 | 9.2% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:46 to 04:42 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:19 to 03:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:26 to 07:26 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:20 to 41:20 | 0.0% |
| Mcguckin Chris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:30 | 00:00 | 04:24 -00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 03:30 | 04:20 -00:05 | 04:24 -00:54 |
| Running 2 | 04:57 | 07:45 | 04:54 +00:03 | 08:44 -00:59 |
| Sled Push | 03:19 | 12:42 | 04:17 -00:58 | 13:38 -00:56 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 16:01 | 05:29 -00:07 | 17:55 -01:54 |
| Sled Pull | 10:43 | 21:23 | 07:39 +03:04 | 23:24 -02:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:15 | 32:06 | 05:27 -00:12 | 31:03 +01:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:56 | 37:21 | 05:05 +00:51 | 36:30 +00:51 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 43:17 | 05:34 +00:04 | 41:35 +01:42 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 48:55 | 04:46 +00:00 | 47:09 +01:46 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 53:41 | 05:30 -00:06 | 51:55 +01:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 59:05 | 02:36 -00:07 | 57:25 +01:40 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 01:01:34 | 05:32 -00:10 | 01:00:01 +01:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:05 | 01:06:56 | 05:41 +00:24 | 01:05:33 +01:23 |
| Running 8 | 05:54 | 01:13:01 | 06:18 -00:24 | 01:11:14 +01:47 |
| Wall Balls | 07:26 | 01:18:55 | 07:49 -00:23 | 01:17:32 +01:23 |
| Roxzone | 06:16 | 01:32:30 | 07:09 -00:53 | 01:32:30 |
Chris Mcguckin delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 254 out of 402 athletes and ranking 52nd in his age group. His total running time of 41:20 was notably faster than the average by 01:59, indicating a strong running profile. The initial running segments suggest that Chris started the race at a fast pace, with Running 1 being significantly faster than the average and placing him in the 8th percentile. This demonstrates his capability as a strong runner. However, his strength-based exercises showed room for improvement, particularly in the Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schellhammer Lorenz | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:32:55 | |
| rodriguez juan | 2024 New York | 01:32:52 | |
| Wilson Charlie | 2021 Austin | 01:32:20 | |
| Kaźmierski Maciej | 2024 Poznan | 01:32:02 | |
| Schött Dominik | 2019 Essen | 01:32:47 | |
| Witzel Tobias | 2019 Hannover | 01:32:49 | |
| Parry Dan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:32:50 | |
| Pozzoli Alessandro | 2023 Rimini | 01:32:05 | |
| Walker Ross | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:33 | |
| Lichtenauer Michael | 2019 Wien | 01:32:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
