Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 199 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lemmelijn Ward's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lemmelijn Ward's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lemmelijn Ward's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lemmelijn Ward's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:41 | 32:17 to 30:36 | 48.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:38 | 04:16 to 02:38 | 46.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 03:59 to 03:48 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:21 to 01:21 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:50 to 03:50 | 0.0% |
| Lemmelijn Ward | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:36 | 00:00 | 03:27 -00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:44 | 02:36 | 03:53 -00:09 | 03:27 -00:51 |
| Running 2 | 03:47 | 06:20 | 03:38 +00:09 | 07:20 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 10:07 | 02:46 -00:31 | 10:58 -00:51 |
| Running 3 | 04:04 | 12:22 | 03:53 +00:11 | 13:44 -01:22 |
| Sled Pull | 03:59 | 16:26 | 04:05 -00:06 | 17:37 -01:11 |
| Running 4 | 04:14 | 20:25 | 03:54 +00:20 | 21:42 -01:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:16 | 24:39 | 02:52 +01:24 | 25:36 -00:57 |
| Running 5 | 04:25 | 28:55 | 03:57 +00:28 | 28:28 +00:27 |
| Rowing | 03:55 | 33:20 | 04:05 -00:10 | 32:25 +00:55 |
| Running 6 | 04:14 | 37:15 | 03:53 +00:21 | 36:30 +00:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:21 | 41:29 | 01:38 -00:17 | 40:23 +01:06 |
| Running 7 | 04:23 | 42:50 | 03:56 +00:27 | 42:01 +00:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:43 | 47:13 | 03:25 -00:42 | 45:57 +01:16 |
| Running 8 | 04:37 | 49:56 | 04:12 +00:25 | 49:22 +00:34 |
| Wall Balls | 03:50 | 54:33 | 04:45 -00:55 | 53:34 +00:59 |
| Roxzone | 04:08 | 01:02:22 | 04:03 +00:05 | 01:02:22 |
Ward Lemmelijn displayed a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 11th out of 402 athletes and 5th in his age group. His performance places him in the top 2% overall and top 6% within his age group, demonstrating an exceptional level of fitness and competition readiness. However, his total running time was 1:10 slower than average, indicating a potential area for improvement in his running efficiency. His running segments suggest that he might have started the race too fast (as seen in Running 1) and struggled to maintain this pace, evident in the slower times in subsequent running segments. This suggests that Ward has a hybrid profile, with strengths in both running and strength exercises, but with room to refine his running endurance and pacing strategy.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodward Erik | 2022 München | 01:02:28 | |
| Blekkan Steffen | 2023 Malaga | 01:02:35 | |
| Melheim Oscar Adrian | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:02:49 | |
| Storath Lukas | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:02:49 | |
| Mc Gowan Shane | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:02:32 | |
| Bryant Jordan | 2023 Dubai | 01:02:27 | |
| Corlett Adam | 2023 Glasgow | 01:02:25 | |
| Patiño Vieites Ruben | 2023 Valencia | 01:02:17 | |
| Moumen Jaafar | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:02:04 | |
| Pedrocchi Tiziano | 2024 Hamburg | 01:02:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:05:28 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:04:42 | |
| 2024 Köln | 01:04:39 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | — | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
