Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kers Richard's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kers Richard's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kers Richard's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kers Richard's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:01 | 50:23 to 43:22 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:19 to 05:19 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:42 to 03:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Kers Richard | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:11 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 05:11 | 04:30 -00:13 | 04:47 +00:24 |
| Running 2 | 05:08 | 09:28 | 05:07 +00:01 | 09:17 +00:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 14:36 | 03:03 -00:26 | 14:24 +00:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 17:13 | 05:36 -00:13 | 17:27 -00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 04:01 | 22:36 | 05:12 -01:11 | 23:03 -00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 26:37 | 05:35 -00:03 | 28:15 -01:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:19 | 32:09 | 05:40 -00:21 | 33:50 -01:41 |
| Running 5 | 06:02 | 37:28 | 05:46 +00:16 | 39:30 -02:02 |
| Rowing | 04:26 | 43:30 | 04:53 -00:27 | 45:16 -01:46 |
| Running 6 | 05:47 | 47:56 | 05:35 +00:12 | 50:09 -02:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:45 | 53:43 | 02:17 -00:32 | 55:44 -02:01 |
| Running 7 | 08:15 | 55:28 | 05:35 +02:40 | 58:01 -02:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:42 | 01:03:43 | 05:25 -01:43 | 01:03:36 +00:07 |
| Running 8 | 09:09 | 01:07:25 | 06:17 +02:52 | 01:09:01 -01:36 |
| Wall Balls | 04:59 | 01:16:34 | 06:55 -01:56 | 01:15:18 +01:16 |
| Roxzone | 08:08 | 01:29:32 | 07:19 +00:49 | 01:29:32 |
Richard Kers delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 41% overall and top 47% in his age group. His strength lies in the strength-based exercises like Sled Pull, Farmer's Carry, and Sandbag Lunges, where he finished well above average, showcasing a strong strength profile. However, his total running time was 5 minutes and 39 seconds slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in running efficiency. The initial running segments suggest he started with a decent pace but struggled significantly in the later stages, possibly suggesting fatigue or a need for better pacing strategy.
With a total running time slower than average, Richard should focus on improving running endurance and efficiency. The significant slowing in running segments 7 and 8 suggests fatigue.
The roxzone time was 1 minute and 1 second slower than average, indicating a need to improve transitions between exercise zones.
Although faster than average, further improvement can be made in this segment to gain time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sieler Dennis | 2024 Köln | 01:29:12 | |
| Renton Rob | 2023 London | 01:29:20 | |
| Muir Mark | 2023 Dublin | 01:29:03 | |
| Kemel Yanisse | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:58 | |
| Van Den Boogaard Nick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:35 | |
| Rivera Ismael | 2023 Bilbao | 01:29:30 | |
| Hayden Paul | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:43 | |
| Black Cameron | 2024 Dallas | 01:29:50 | |
| Michels Pascal | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:29:09 | |
| Sorce Antoine | 2024 Maastricht | 01:30:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:32:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
