Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Van Den Boogaard Nick's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Van Den Boogaard Nick hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Van Den Boogaard Nick’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Den Boogaard Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:49 | 05:58 to 05:09 | 31.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:38 | 05:35 to 04:57 | 24.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:28 | 02:38 to 02:10 | 17.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:26 | 06:56 to 06:30 | 16.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:35 to 04:28 | 4.5% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:55 to 04:50 | 3.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:57 to 02:53 | 2.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:17 to 43:17 | 0.0% |
| Van Den Boogaard Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:32 | 00:00 | 04:47 -01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 03:32 | 04:30 +00:05 | 04:47 -01:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 08:07 | 05:07 +00:13 | 09:17 -01:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 13:27 | 03:03 -00:06 | 14:24 -00:57 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 16:24 | 05:36 -00:11 | 17:27 -01:03 |
| Sled Pull | 05:35 | 21:49 | 05:12 +00:23 | 23:03 -01:14 |
| Running 4 | 05:33 | 27:24 | 05:35 -00:02 | 28:15 -00:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:18 | 32:57 | 05:42 -00:24 | 33:50 -00:53 |
| Running 5 | 05:39 | 38:15 | 05:46 -00:07 | 39:32 -01:17 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 43:54 | 04:54 +00:01 | 45:18 -01:24 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 48:49 | 05:35 +00:09 | 50:12 -01:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:38 | 54:33 | 02:17 +00:21 | 55:47 -01:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:51 | 57:11 | 05:35 +00:16 | 58:04 -00:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:58 | 01:03:02 | 05:26 +00:32 | 01:03:39 -00:37 |
| Running 8 | 06:17 | 01:09:00 | 06:16 +00:01 | 01:09:05 -00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 06:56 | 01:15:17 | 06:55 +00:01 | 01:15:21 -00:04 |
| Roxzone | 07:31 | 01:29:35 | 07:19 +00:12 | 01:29:35 |
Nick Van Den Boogaard delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX competition, finishing in the top 41% overall and the top 45% in his age group. His total running time of 00:43:17 was notably 01:27 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. He started the race with an impressive pace, evident in his first running segment, where he was 01:12 faster than average, placing him in the 3rd percentile rank. This suggests an initial burst of speed which may have led to some fatigue in the latter stages. Although his running strength is apparent, areas requiring improvement include transitions between exercise zones (Roxzone), strength-oriented exercises, and maintaining energy levels throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruiz Ortega Jose Luis | 2024 Madrid | 01:29:58 | |
| Karzenski Michael | 2022 Essen | 01:29:56 | |
| Samonte Charlie | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:29:11 | |
| Evans Lee | 2024 London | 01:29:39 | |
| Plaza Merchán Alejandro | 2023 Malaga | 01:29:08 | |
| Howe Greg | 2023 London | 01:29:36 | |
| Spaans Maarten | 2024 Dubai | 01:29:30 | |
| Henson Gavin | 2022 London | 01:29:17 | |
| Luger Rene | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:30:05 | |
| Wündsch Lukas | 2019 Hannover | 01:29:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:35:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
