Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Haagh Mara's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Haagh Mara's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Haagh Mara's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Haagh Mara's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:51 | 46:19 to 44:28 | 33.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:08 | 05:28 to 04:20 | 20.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:51 | 06:05 to 05:14 | 15.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 03:10 to 02:30 | 12.0% |
| Rowing | 00:35 | 05:49 to 05:14 | 10.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 02:24 to 02:05 | 5.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 05:10 to 05:00 | 3.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:36 to 03:36 | 0.0% |
| Haagh Mara | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:26 | 00:00 | 05:03 -01:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:10 | 03:26 | 05:05 +00:05 | 05:03 -01:37 |
| Running 2 | 07:38 | 08:36 | 05:25 +02:13 | 10:08 -01:32 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 16:14 | 02:40 +00:30 | 15:33 +00:41 |
| Running 3 | 05:39 | 19:24 | 05:43 -00:04 | 18:13 +01:11 |
| Sled Pull | 06:05 | 25:03 | 05:36 +00:29 | 23:56 +01:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:45 | 31:08 | 05:44 +00:01 | 29:32 +01:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:51 | 36:53 | 05:58 -01:07 | 35:16 +01:37 |
| Running 5 | 05:56 | 41:44 | 05:53 +00:03 | 41:14 +00:30 |
| Rowing | 05:49 | 47:40 | 05:20 +00:29 | 47:07 +00:33 |
| Running 6 | 05:51 | 53:29 | 05:47 +00:04 | 52:27 +01:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 59:20 | 02:13 +00:11 | 58:14 +01:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:47 | 01:01:44 | 05:44 +00:03 | 01:00:27 +01:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:36 | 01:07:31 | 04:39 -01:03 | 01:06:11 +01:20 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:11:07 | 06:06 +00:14 | 01:10:50 +00:17 |
| Wall Balls | 05:28 | 01:17:27 | 04:49 +00:39 | 01:16:56 +00:31 |
| Roxzone | 05:35 | 01:28:22 | 06:37 -01:02 | 01:28:22 |
Mara Haagh delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking in the top 11% overall and the top 10% within her age group. Her overall time of 01:28:22 showcases her competitive edge. Although her total running time was 00:05 slower than average, her transitions, as seen in the Roxzone time, were notably swift, indicating efficiency in movement between stations. Initial running segments suggest a fast start, with the first run being 01:33 faster than average, demonstrating strong pacing at the outset. However, the overall running performance was slightly below average, suggesting a hybrid profile with more room to improve both strength and endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Peer Van Trijp Samantha | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:37 | |
| Curran Megan | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:40 | |
| Skeggs Becky | 2024 London | 01:28:13 | |
| Wall Ciara | 2024 Dublin | 01:28:38 | |
| Miolard Elodie | 2023 Paris | 01:28:27 | |
| Hider Ava | 2023 München | 01:28:35 | |
| Mcneish AnneSophie | 2024 Paris | 01:28:09 | |
| Vu Thu Anh | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:28:19 | |
| Diederich Laura | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:28:17 | |
| Connor Fern | 2023 Birmingham | 01:28:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:29:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
