Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 611 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Glendinning Rebecca's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Glendinning Rebecca's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Glendinning Rebecca's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Glendinning Rebecca's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:58 | 09:15 to 06:17 | 38.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:34 | 10:16 to 07:42 | 33.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:24 | 08:13 to 06:49 | 18.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:30 | 03:05 to 02:35 | 6.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 06:09 to 05:49 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:06 to 03:06 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:41 to 05:41 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:04 to 47:04 | 0.0% |
| Glendinning Rebecca | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:28 | 00:00 | 05:45 +00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:09 | 06:28 | 05:25 -00:16 | 05:45 +00:43 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 11:37 | 06:16 -00:53 | 11:10 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 03:06 | 17:00 | 03:10 -00:04 | 17:26 -00:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:39 | 20:06 | 06:39 -01:00 | 20:36 -00:30 |
| Sled Pull | 08:13 | 25:45 | 06:57 +01:16 | 27:15 -01:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 33:58 | 06:40 -01:04 | 34:12 -00:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:16 | 39:34 | 08:02 +02:14 | 40:52 -01:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 49:50 | 06:55 -01:07 | 48:54 +00:56 |
| Rowing | 05:41 | 55:38 | 05:47 -00:06 | 55:49 -00:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:52 | 01:01:19 | 06:46 -00:54 | 01:01:36 -00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:05 | 01:07:11 | 02:36 +00:29 | 01:08:22 -01:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:56 | 01:10:16 | 06:44 -00:48 | 01:10:58 -00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:09 | 01:16:12 | 05:59 +00:10 | 01:17:42 -01:30 |
| Running 8 | 06:24 | 01:22:21 | 07:35 -01:11 | 01:23:41 -01:20 |
| Wall Balls | 09:15 | 01:28:45 | 06:31 +02:44 | 01:31:16 -02:31 |
| Roxzone | 08:35 | 01:46:29 | 08:42 -00:07 | 01:46:29 |
Rebecca Glendinning demonstrated an impressive performance at the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, finishing in the top 26% of 4107 athletes. In her age group (50-54), she ranked even higher, placing within the top 18% of 232 athletes. Her overall time was 01:46:29.
Rebecca's total running time was 00:47:04, which is 06:33 faster than the average. This suggests that she has a strong running profile. Her best running lap was 00:05:23.
Analysis of the segments from running 1 to running 4 indicates that Rebecca started slower than average in the first running segment but quickly picked up the pace. Her running times improved significantly for the rest of the race, suggesting that she may have started conservatively to conserve energy for the later stages of the race.
While Rebecca's running performance was strong, there are a few areas where she can improve to enhance her overall race performance, particularly in strength-based segments and transitions:
Going forward, Rebecca may want to consider the following strategies to optimize her race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Call Michelle | 2022 Dallas | 01:46:55 | |
| Souza Ana Paula | 2024 New York | 01:46:47 | |
| Cleaver Joanne | 2024 Perth | 01:46:58 | |
| Taylor Sarah | 2023 London | 01:46:06 | |
| Haglund Cecilia | 2023 Stockholm | 01:46:53 | |
| Negrete Gonzalez Ilse K. | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:46:50 | |
| Brånäs Alice | 2024 Stockholm | 01:46:48 | |
| Mallison Amanda | 2022 Birmingham | 01:46:09 | |
| Hutton Jennifer | 2023 Dallas | 01:46:39 | |
| Ramsay Alana | 2023 Glasgow | 01:46:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
