Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Eekhof Hans's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Eekhof Hans's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Eekhof Hans's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Eekhof Hans's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:18 | 08:53 to 05:35 | 53.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:29 | 06:46 to 05:17 | 24.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:52 | 07:34 to 06:42 | 14.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:31 | 02:44 to 02:13 | 8.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:25 to 43:25 | 0.0% |
| Eekhof Hans | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:37 | 00:00 | 04:47 -01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 03:37 | 04:32 -00:09 | 04:47 -01:10 |
| Running 2 | 04:57 | 08:00 | 05:13 -00:16 | 09:19 -01:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 12:57 | 03:06 -00:29 | 14:32 -01:35 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 15:34 | 05:43 -00:35 | 17:38 -02:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:28 | 20:42 | 05:18 -00:50 | 23:21 -02:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 25:10 | 05:41 -00:16 | 28:39 -03:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:53 | 30:35 | 05:53 +03:00 | 34:20 -03:45 |
| Running 5 | 05:43 | 39:28 | 05:53 -00:10 | 40:13 -00:45 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 45:11 | 04:56 -00:07 | 46:06 -00:55 |
| Running 6 | 05:35 | 50:00 | 05:43 -00:08 | 51:02 -01:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:44 | 55:35 | 02:19 +00:25 | 56:45 -01:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 58:19 | 05:41 +00:07 | 59:04 -00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:46 | 01:04:07 | 05:32 +01:14 | 01:04:45 -00:38 |
| Running 8 | 07:15 | 01:10:53 | 06:26 +00:49 | 01:10:17 +00:36 |
| Wall Balls | 07:34 | 01:18:08 | 07:08 +00:26 | 01:16:43 +01:25 |
| Roxzone | 05:50 | 01:31:26 | 07:35 -01:45 | 01:31:26 |
Hans Eekhof's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race demonstrates a solid effort, with a commendable overall rank in the top 44% of both the general and age group categories. Notably, Hans's total running time was 2:08 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. This suggests that his strengths lie in his running ability, aligning with his significant gains in the running segments, particularly at the start of the race. However, a slight decline in pace in later running segments suggests a potential over-exertion early on, which may have impacted his performance in strength-based segments and compromised running scenarios.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sbardellati Nicola | 2024 Turin | 01:31:51 | |
| Tomlinson Tom | 2023 Birmingham | 01:31:36 | |
| Bourgine Christian | 2024 Marseille | 01:31:26 | |
| Clément Hugo | 2023 Paris | 01:31:51 | |
| Jacquet Geoffrey | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:31:21 | |
| Chu Daniel | 2024 Gdansk | 01:31:15 | |
| Eriksson Mattias | 2024 Stockholm | 01:31:38 | |
| Maybin Brian | 2023 Dublin | 01:31:28 | |
| Dyke Paul | 2024 London | 01:31:27 | |
| Knoop Sebastian | 2019 Hamburg | 01:31:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:20:57 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:22:17 | |
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:47:20 | |
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:48:37 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:04 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | — | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
