Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Lathouder Hilco's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Lathouder Hilco's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Lathouder Hilco's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Lathouder Hilco's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:40 | 07:22 to 05:42 | 47.4% |
| Run Total | 01:03 | 41:21 to 40:18 | 29.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 04:55 to 04:35 | 9.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:19 | 05:00 to 04:41 | 9.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:28 to 04:19 | 4.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:44 to 01:44 | 0.0% |
| De Lathouder Hilco | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:39 | 00:00 | 04:29 -00:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 03:39 | 04:23 +00:05 | 04:29 -00:50 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 08:07 | 04:50 +00:10 | 08:52 -00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 13:07 | 02:49 -00:18 | 13:42 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 15:38 | 05:13 +00:01 | 16:31 -00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 04:24 | 20:52 | 04:43 -00:19 | 21:44 -00:52 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 25:16 | 05:11 +00:02 | 26:27 -01:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:00 | 30:29 | 05:00 +00:00 | 31:38 -01:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:17 | 35:29 | 05:21 -00:04 | 36:38 -01:09 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 40:46 | 04:44 -00:05 | 41:59 -01:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 45:25 | 05:14 +00:12 | 46:43 -01:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:44 | 50:51 | 02:08 -00:24 | 51:57 -01:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:30 | 52:35 | 05:12 +00:18 | 54:05 -01:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 58:05 | 04:52 +00:03 | 59:17 -01:12 |
| Running 8 | 06:04 | 01:03:00 | 05:43 +00:21 | 01:04:09 -01:09 |
| Wall Balls | 07:22 | 01:09:04 | 06:12 +01:10 | 01:09:52 -00:48 |
| Roxzone | 06:08 | 01:22:26 | 06:22 -00:14 | 01:22:26 |
Hilco De Lathouder delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race. Ranked 872nd overall out of 3118 athletes, he placed in the top 27%, which is an impressive feat. Within his age group (40-44), he ranked 126th, indicating that his capabilities are well-above the average competitor in his category. Notably, his total running time was 13 seconds faster than average, suggesting a strong running capability. However, his performance in strength-based exercises, particularly the Wall Balls, indicates room for improvement. Additionally, initial running segments (Running 1) were significantly faster than average, suggesting a strong start that may have affected his pacing in later segments. Hilco appears to have a hybrid profile but could benefit from enhancing his strength exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kaniatobe Tim | 2023 Dallas | 01:21:58 | |
| Crudden Ciaran | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:26 | |
| Rodríguez Jiménez José Luis | 2022 Valencia | 01:22:56 | |
| Mcenery Christopher | 2023 New York | 01:22:04 | |
| White T | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:37 | |
| Wenzel Matthias | 2022 Bremen | 01:22:04 | |
| Muse Jared | 2023 Dallas | 01:22:56 | |
| Coleman Graham | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:28 | |
| Lam Carson | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:22:34 | |
| Henriet Antoine | 2024 Poznan | 01:22:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
