Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clewits Niels's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clewits Niels's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clewits Niels's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clewits Niels's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:08 | 50:52 to 47:44 | 74.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:03 | 07:30 to 06:27 | 25.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:41 to 04:40 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:47 to 02:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:34 to 06:34 | 0.0% |
| Clewits Niels | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:25 | 00:00 | 05:03 -01:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 03:25 | 04:39 +00:02 | 05:03 -01:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:36 | 08:06 | 05:34 +00:02 | 09:42 -01:36 |
| Sled Push | 02:47 | 13:42 | 03:26 -00:39 | 15:16 -01:34 |
| Running 3 | 06:21 | 16:29 | 06:07 +00:14 | 18:42 -02:13 |
| Sled Pull | 04:11 | 22:50 | 05:50 -01:39 | 24:49 -01:59 |
| Running 4 | 06:37 | 27:01 | 06:05 +00:32 | 30:39 -03:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:30 | 33:38 | 06:36 +00:54 | 36:44 -03:06 |
| Running 5 | 07:01 | 41:08 | 06:21 +00:40 | 43:20 -02:12 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 48:09 | 05:07 -00:03 | 49:41 -01:32 |
| Running 6 | 06:38 | 53:13 | 06:09 +00:29 | 54:48 -01:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 59:51 | 02:31 -00:21 | 01:00:57 -01:06 |
| Running 7 | 06:43 | 01:02:01 | 06:08 +00:35 | 01:03:28 -01:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:37 | 01:08:44 | 06:12 -01:35 | 01:09:36 -00:52 |
| Running 8 | 08:34 | 01:13:21 | 07:09 +01:25 | 01:15:48 -02:27 |
| Wall Balls | 06:34 | 01:21:55 | 07:58 -01:24 | 01:22:57 -01:02 |
| Roxzone | 11:07 | 01:39:30 | 08:35 +02:32 | 01:39:30 |
Niels Clewits demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing in the top 57% overall and 58% within his age group. While his running performance indicates room for improvement, his strength segments were notably strong, particularly the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges, where he ranked exceptionally well. This suggests a profile leaning towards strength rather than running. His initial pacing was exceptionally fast, but he gradually slowed down, indicating the need for better pacing strategies to maintain stamina throughout the race.
As Niels' total running time was 01:55 slower than average, there's a need to enhance his running efficiency and endurance. To improve this:
The time spent in the Roxzone was significantly slower than average. Improving transition times and overall fitness can address this:
This segment was 01:01 slower than average, indicating a need for both technique refinement and endurance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Krips Tom | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:39:34 | |
| Van Den Hudding Eric | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:39:23 | |
| Gervin Gerard | 2024 Dublin | 01:39:17 | |
| Tan Patricvk | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:39:37 | |
| Klingler David | 2022 Essen | 01:39:38 | |
| Murnane Sean | 2024 Dublin | 01:39:42 | |
| Sockeel Quentin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:39:04 | |
| Mariu Henderson | 2024 Perth | 01:39:04 | |
| Bonanno Max | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:39:36 | |
| Wade Jamie | 2024 Birmingham | 01:39:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
