Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 807 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clews Ashley's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clews Ashley's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clews Ashley's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clews Ashley's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:57 | 53:08 to 51:11 | 60.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 06:53 to 06:23 | 15.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:28 | 07:45 to 07:17 | 14.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 03:02 to 02:46 | 8.3% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 05:18 to 05:17 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:48 to 02:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:46 to 07:46 | 0.0% |
| Clews Ashley | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:25 | 00:00 | 05:19 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 05:25 | 04:47 -00:11 | 05:19 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:51 | 10:01 | 05:59 -00:08 | 10:06 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 15:52 | 03:43 -00:55 | 16:05 -00:13 |
| Running 3 | 06:16 | 18:40 | 06:36 -00:20 | 19:48 -01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 06:53 | 24:56 | 06:32 +00:21 | 26:24 -01:28 |
| Running 4 | 07:04 | 31:49 | 06:35 +00:29 | 32:56 -01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:45 | 38:53 | 07:23 +00:22 | 39:31 -00:38 |
| Running 5 | 07:36 | 46:38 | 06:54 +00:42 | 46:54 -00:16 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 54:14 | 05:19 -00:01 | 53:48 +00:26 |
| Running 6 | 06:20 | 59:32 | 06:41 -00:21 | 59:07 +00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:02 | 01:05:52 | 02:41 +00:21 | 01:05:48 +00:04 |
| Running 7 | 06:22 | 01:08:54 | 06:42 -00:20 | 01:08:29 +00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:21 | 01:15:16 | 06:53 -01:32 | 01:15:11 +00:05 |
| Running 8 | 08:18 | 01:20:37 | 08:08 +00:10 | 01:22:04 -01:27 |
| Wall Balls | 07:46 | 01:28:55 | 08:54 -01:08 | 01:30:12 -01:17 |
| Roxzone | 12:25 | 01:48:58 | 09:52 +02:33 | 01:48:58 |
Ashley Clews, despite being in the top 59% of all athletes and top 63% in his age group, has showcased a few areas where improvement can be made. His overall time was 01:48:58 with a total running time of 00:53:08, which was 00:01 faster than the average. This indicates that Ashley has a strong running profile. However, it's notable that his running times varied, with some segments being slower than average. This suggests a need for more consistent pacing. His strength segments, such as the Ski Erg and Sled Push, were faster than average, indicating a balanced hybrid profile of both strength and endurance.
Ashley should aim for a more consistent pacing across all running segments to ensure he doesn't burn out too quickly. He should also prioritize practicing transitions to reduce time spent in the Roxzone. During the race, it may be beneficial for him to maintain a steady pace during the run segments and then push harder on the strength segments where he naturally excels. Also, focusing on proper form during the strength segments will help prevent fatigue and maintain efficiency throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall Andy | 2024 Birmingham | 01:49:28 | |
| Gharaei Sepehr | 2024 Anaheim | 01:49:28 | |
| Kunze Mike | 2021 Berlin | 01:49:22 | |
| Byrne Noel | 2024 Dublin | 01:48:44 | |
| Kuhl Nils | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:48:30 | |
| Toko Samuel | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:49:16 | |
| Jones Chris | 2022 London | 01:48:48 | |
| Ares Calvo Juan | 2022 Madrid | 01:48:32 | |
| Marten Alexander | 2023 München | 01:49:12 | |
| Van Hooijdonk Jeroen | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:48:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
