Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Felmer Billy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Felmer Billy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Felmer Billy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Felmer Billy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:45 | 07:06 to 05:21 | 45.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:55 | 04:03 to 03:08 | 23.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:43 | 06:18 to 05:35 | 18.6% |
| Run Total | 00:23 | 46:03 to 45:40 | 10.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:24 to 02:19 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:44 to 06:44 | 0.0% |
| Felmer Billy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 04:57 -00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 04:29 | 04:34 -00:02 | 04:57 -00:28 |
| Running 2 | 05:25 | 09:01 | 05:23 +00:02 | 09:31 -00:30 |
| Sled Push | 04:03 | 14:26 | 03:12 +00:51 | 14:54 -00:28 |
| Running 3 | 06:32 | 18:29 | 05:53 +00:39 | 18:06 +00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 07:06 | 25:01 | 05:31 +01:35 | 23:59 +01:02 |
| Running 4 | 06:17 | 32:07 | 05:52 +00:25 | 29:30 +02:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:12 | 38:24 | 06:09 -01:57 | 35:22 +03:02 |
| Running 5 | 05:46 | 42:36 | 06:04 -00:18 | 41:31 +01:05 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 48:22 | 05:01 -00:07 | 47:35 +00:47 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 53:16 | 05:54 -00:20 | 52:36 +00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 58:50 | 02:24 +00:00 | 58:30 +00:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 01:01:14 | 05:53 -00:05 | 01:00:54 +00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:18 | 01:07:02 | 05:46 +00:32 | 01:06:47 +00:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:14 | 01:13:20 | 06:45 -00:31 | 01:12:33 +00:47 |
| Wall Balls | 06:44 | 01:19:34 | 07:24 -00:40 | 01:19:18 +00:16 |
| Roxzone | 08:31 | 01:34:42 | 08:00 +00:31 | 01:34:42 |
Billy's best running lap was 00:04:29, which was 00:17 faster than the average. This indicates that he has good speed and efficiency in his running. However, his performance in other segments of the race, such as the sled pull, running 3, and sandbag lunges, showed room for improvement.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas for improvement, Billy can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races. It is important for him to tailor his training to his specific strengths and weaknesses, and to continuously evaluate and adjust his training program based on his progress.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Weise Kai | 2022 Bremen | 01:34:20 | |
| Halbauer Marc | 2023 Köln | 01:34:49 | |
| Cooper Alex | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:34:33 | |
| Pigoni Michael | 2024 Milan | 01:34:38 | |
| Allmark Michael | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:42 | |
| Margelli Roberto | 2024 Turin | 01:35:07 | |
| Leroy Nicolas | 2023 Malmö | 01:34:25 | |
| Williams Aaron | 2024 Birmingham | 01:34:30 | |
| Luchmun Kevin | 2023 London | 01:34:45 | |
| Closset Simon | 2023 Paris | 01:34:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Orlando | 02:05:24 | |
| 2019 New York | 01:39:55 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
