Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Curtis Ian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Curtis Ian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Curtis Ian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Curtis Ian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:50 | 47:55 to 46:05 | 48.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:46 | 06:49 to 06:03 | 20.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:40 | 06:20 to 05:40 | 17.8% |
| Rowing | 00:29 | 05:28 to 04:59 | 12.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:32 to 06:32 | 0.0% |
| Curtis Ian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:02 | 00:00 | 04:58 +01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 06:02 | 04:36 -00:01 | 04:58 +01:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 10:37 | 05:24 -00:03 | 09:34 +01:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 15:58 | 03:14 -00:36 | 14:58 +01:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:39 | 18:36 | 05:54 -00:15 | 18:12 +00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 24:15 | 05:38 -00:57 | 24:06 +00:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 28:56 | 05:54 -00:04 | 29:44 -00:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:49 | 34:46 | 06:19 +00:30 | 35:38 -00:52 |
| Running 5 | 06:22 | 41:35 | 06:08 +00:14 | 41:57 -00:22 |
| Rowing | 05:28 | 47:57 | 05:03 +00:25 | 48:05 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 53:25 | 05:56 -00:19 | 53:08 +00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 59:02 | 02:27 -00:37 | 59:04 -00:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:59 | 01:00:52 | 05:56 +00:03 | 01:01:31 -00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:20 | 01:06:51 | 05:54 +00:26 | 01:07:27 -00:36 |
| Running 8 | 07:08 | 01:13:11 | 06:49 +00:19 | 01:13:21 -00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 06:32 | 01:20:19 | 07:40 -01:08 | 01:20:10 +00:09 |
| Roxzone | 09:19 | 01:36:03 | 08:13 +01:06 | 01:36:03 |
Ian Curtis, a 50-54 age group athlete, performed exceptionally well in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event. He placed in the top 49% of 4107 athletes overall and in the top 39% of his age group. His overall time was 01:36:03, demonstrating a solid performance. However, an in-depth analysis of his performance reveals areas for potential improvement.
Ian's total running time was 00:47:55, which was 00:41 slower than the average. This indicates that Ian has a hybrid profile, with a balance between running and strength. However, his strength seems to be slightly superior to his running, as evidenced by his faster-than-average times in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry segments.
Ian's pacing appears to be good, as he did not start too fast or too slow. His first four running segments were mostly faster than average, suggesting a strong start. However, towards the end of the race, his running times slowed down compared to the average, indicating potential fatigue.
To improve future race performance, Ian should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schmidt Lars | 2023 Hamburg | 01:36:29 | |
| Lusbrink Patrick | 2024 Köln | 01:35:43 | |
| Ratzke Sebastian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:35:58 | |
| Hartwig Alexander | 2024 Hamburg | 01:35:57 | |
| Donaldson Chris | 2023 Birmingham | 01:35:54 | |
| Barry Isaac | 2024 Madrid | 01:35:41 | |
| Connor Kieran | 2023 Glasgow | 01:36:28 | |
| Huijbregts Rob | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:36:31 | |
| Brehm Christopher | 2023 Paris | 01:35:57 | |
| Bradford Marc | 2023 Manchester | 01:36:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:32:43 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
