Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 601 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcaveety Jennifer's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcaveety Jennifer's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcaveety Jennifer's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcaveety Jennifer's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:55 | 10:17 to 06:22 | 42.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:49 | 10:36 to 07:47 | 30.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:02 | 07:54 to 05:52 | 22.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 07:13 to 06:53 | 3.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 05:29 to 05:26 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 03:17 to 03:14 | 0.5% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:01 to 46:01 | 0.0% |
| Mcaveety Jennifer | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:46 | 00:00 | 05:41 +01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:29 | 06:46 | 05:26 +00:03 | 05:41 +01:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 12:15 | 06:22 -01:04 | 11:07 +01:08 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 17:33 | 03:17 +00:00 | 17:29 +00:04 |
| Running 3 | 05:34 | 20:50 | 06:44 -01:10 | 20:46 +00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 07:13 | 26:24 | 07:04 +00:09 | 27:30 -01:06 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 33:37 | 06:47 -01:09 | 34:34 -00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:36 | 39:15 | 07:56 +02:40 | 41:21 -02:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 49:51 | 07:00 -01:25 | 49:17 +00:34 |
| Rowing | 05:32 | 55:26 | 05:46 -00:14 | 56:17 -00:51 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 01:00:58 | 06:51 -01:08 | 01:02:03 -01:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 01:06:41 | 02:37 -00:26 | 01:08:54 -02:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 01:08:52 | 06:49 -01:18 | 01:11:31 -02:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:54 | 01:14:23 | 06:01 +01:53 | 01:18:20 -03:57 |
| Running 8 | 05:59 | 01:22:17 | 07:37 -01:38 | 01:24:21 -02:04 |
| Wall Balls | 10:17 | 01:28:16 | 06:31 +03:46 | 01:31:58 -03:42 |
| Roxzone | 08:54 | 01:47:19 | 08:50 +00:04 | 01:47:19 |
Overall, Jennifer Mcaveety performed exceptionally in the 2024 Madrid HYROX race, ranking in the top 22% of 1509 athletes. Specifically, she excelled in her total running time, finishing a commendable 8:06 faster than average. This indicates that Jennifer has a strong runner's profile. However, it was observed that her performance at the start of the race, specifically during the Running 1 segment, was slower than average. This suggests that Jennifer might have started the race at a slower pace, potentially to conserve energy for later stages of the race.
Based on Jennifer's performance, a few race strategies can be suggested:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Eckmann Melissa | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:47:46 | |
| Damaševičiūtė Agnė | 2024 Poznan | 01:46:59 | |
| Guillen Solis Carolina | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:47:29 | |
| Diaz De León Fonseca Carminia | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:46:51 | |
| Farrell Nicola | 2022 Manchester | 01:47:49 | |
| Loo Geok Leng | 2023 Singapore | 01:46:53 | |
| Komatsuzaki Amy | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:47:11 | |
| Fish Julia | 2024 London | 01:47:27 | |
| De Vries Schultink Dominique | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:46:52 | |
| Lopez Rodriguez Ana Carmen | 2022 Madrid | 01:47:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
