Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Le May Graham's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Le May Graham's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Le May Graham's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Le May Graham's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:12 | 44:13 to 43:01 | 34.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:35 | 05:02 to 04:27 | 16.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:31 | 05:24 to 04:53 | 14.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 03:20 to 02:51 | 13.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 | 02:37 to 02:08 | 13.8% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 05:03 to 04:49 | 6.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:36 to 05:36 | 0.0% |
| Le May Graham | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:59 | 00:00 | 04:45 +00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:02 | 04:59 | 04:29 +00:33 | 04:45 +00:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 10:01 | 05:06 +00:06 | 09:14 +00:47 |
| Sled Push | 03:20 | 15:13 | 03:00 +00:20 | 14:20 +00:53 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 18:33 | 05:33 -00:10 | 17:20 +01:13 |
| Sled Pull | 05:24 | 23:56 | 05:08 +00:16 | 22:53 +01:03 |
| Running 4 | 05:24 | 29:20 | 05:33 -00:09 | 28:01 +01:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:56 | 34:44 | 05:38 -01:42 | 33:34 +01:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 38:40 | 05:44 -00:09 | 39:12 -00:32 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 44:15 | 04:53 +00:10 | 44:56 -00:41 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 49:18 | 05:35 -00:09 | 49:49 -00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:37 | 54:44 | 02:16 +00:21 | 55:24 -00:40 |
| Running 7 | 05:25 | 57:21 | 05:34 -00:09 | 57:40 -00:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:23 | 01:02:46 | 05:23 -01:00 | 01:03:14 -00:28 |
| Running 8 | 06:53 | 01:07:09 | 06:15 +00:38 | 01:08:37 -01:28 |
| Wall Balls | 05:36 | 01:14:02 | 06:49 -01:13 | 01:14:52 -00:50 |
| Roxzone | 09:26 | 01:28:56 | 07:15 +02:11 | 01:28:56 |
Graham Le May's performance was commendable in the HYROX 2024 Paris event. His overall rank is in the top 58% of all participants and within his age group, he managed to score in the top 56%. His total running time was faster than average, achieving a time of 00:44:13, which is 00:06 faster than the average. This suggests that Graham has a runner profile. His best running lap was achieved in 00:05:12. In the initial segments, Graham started slower than the average pace but picked up speed in the latter segments, signaling a strong capacity for stamina and endurance.
Graham should consider implementing the following strategies in his future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Friedrich Benjamin | 2018 Hamburg | 01:28:59 | |
| Richter Patrick | 2024 Köln | 01:28:57 | |
| Jordan Matthew | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:28:41 | |
| Albers Thijmen | 2024 Maastricht | 01:28:28 | |
| Mccabe Simon | 2024 London | 01:29:10 | |
| Stroud Ed | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:09 | |
| Tandberg Nicolai Oniyeden M. | 2024 Stockholm | 01:29:05 | |
| Muzzurru David | 2024 Milan | 01:29:23 | |
| Low Gonzalez Christopher | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:25 | |
| Kołodziejski Jarosław | 2023 Warschau | 01:28:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:33:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
