Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Feigel Johannes's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Feigel Johannes's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Feigel Johannes's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Feigel Johannes's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:12 | 42:51 to 40:39 | 48.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:57 | 05:43 to 04:46 | 20.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:57 | 06:45 to 05:48 | 20.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:17 to 01:59 | 6.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:09 | 04:37 to 04:28 | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Feigel Johannes | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:52 | 00:00 | 04:29 -00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 03:52 | 04:24 -00:06 | 04:29 -00:37 |
| Running 2 | 04:44 | 08:10 | 04:52 -00:08 | 08:53 -00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:01 | 12:54 | 02:51 -00:50 | 13:45 -00:51 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 14:55 | 05:16 -00:15 | 16:36 -01:41 |
| Sled Pull | 04:37 | 19:56 | 04:46 -00:09 | 21:52 -01:56 |
| Running 4 | 05:22 | 24:33 | 05:14 +00:08 | 26:38 -02:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:43 | 29:55 | 05:02 +00:41 | 31:52 -01:57 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 35:38 | 05:24 +00:39 | 36:54 -01:16 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 41:41 | 04:45 -00:09 | 42:18 -00:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 46:17 | 05:16 +00:33 | 47:03 -00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 52:06 | 02:08 +00:09 | 52:19 -00:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:28 | 54:23 | 05:15 +00:13 | 54:27 -00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:16 | 59:51 | 04:55 -00:39 | 59:42 +00:09 |
| Running 8 | 06:36 | 01:04:07 | 05:48 +00:48 | 01:04:37 -00:30 |
| Wall Balls | 06:45 | 01:10:43 | 06:15 +00:30 | 01:10:25 +00:18 |
| Roxzone | 05:41 | 01:23:09 | 06:29 -00:48 | 01:23:09 |
Pacing and Profile:
Feigel's overall pacing was consistent throughout the race, with no significant fluctuations in his splits. However, it is worth noting that his total running time was 02:43 slower than the average, indicating that he may benefit from focusing on improving his running performance. While he performed well in the running segments individually, his total running time suggests that he could benefit from additional running-specific training.
In conclusion, Johannes Feigel had a strong performance in the 2018 Hamburg Hyrox race, finishing in the top 10% of all athletes and the top 12% of his age group. While he demonstrated strengths in certain segments, there are areas where he can make improvements to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on improving his running endurance, explosive power, and running form, Feigel can continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Omahoney Callum | 2024 Dublin | 01:23:23 | |
| Owen Andrew | 2023 Hamburg | 01:23:00 | |
| Dayalji Vijay | 2022 London | 01:22:59 | |
| Van Der Zanden Rick | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:53 | |
| Liebrich Johannes | 2022 Hamburg | 01:22:57 | |
| Carr James | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:22:52 | |
| Dhaenens Bram | 2022 Maastricht | 01:22:49 | |
| Harriman Daniel | 2023 London | 01:23:07 | |
| Chen Willi | 2022 Wien | 01:23:24 | |
| Grundmann Martijn | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
