Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Donoghue Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Donoghue Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Donoghue Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Donoghue Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 05:10 | 10:22 to 05:12 | 74.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:46 | 03:06 to 02:20 | 11.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:24 | 02:12 to 01:48 | 5.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 04:22 to 04:02 | 4.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:23 to 04:13 | 2.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:07 | 04:19 to 04:12 | 1.7% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:34 to 04:32 | 0.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 34:52 to 34:52 | 0.0% |
| Donoghue Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:42 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 04:42 | 04:19 +00:04 | 04:18 +00:24 |
| Running 2 | 04:05 | 09:05 | 04:37 -00:32 | 08:37 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 03:06 | 13:10 | 02:40 +00:26 | 13:14 -00:04 |
| Running 3 | 04:15 | 16:16 | 05:00 -00:45 | 15:54 +00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:22 | 20:31 | 04:26 -00:04 | 20:54 -00:23 |
| Running 4 | 04:19 | 24:53 | 04:58 -00:39 | 25:20 -00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:10 | 29:12 | 04:36 -00:26 | 30:18 -01:06 |
| Running 5 | 04:22 | 33:22 | 05:06 -00:44 | 34:54 -01:32 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 37:44 | 04:38 -00:04 | 40:00 -02:16 |
| Running 6 | 04:19 | 42:18 | 05:00 -00:41 | 44:38 -02:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 46:37 | 02:00 +00:12 | 49:38 -03:01 |
| Running 7 | 04:20 | 48:49 | 04:59 -00:39 | 51:38 -02:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:19 | 53:09 | 04:32 -00:13 | 56:37 -03:28 |
| Running 8 | 04:32 | 57:28 | 05:26 -00:54 | 01:01:09 -03:41 |
| Wall Balls | 10:22 | 01:02:00 | 05:42 +04:40 | 01:06:35 -04:35 |
| Roxzone | 05:57 | 01:18:11 | 05:54 +00:03 | 01:18:11 |
Mark Donoghue, in the age group category of 40-44, displayed an impressive performance overall, ranking in the top 18% of all participating athletes and in the top 17% of his age group. His overall time of 01:18:11 and total running time of 00:34:52, which was 04:46 faster than the average, demonstrated his strong running skills. Despite starting slightly slower in the first running segment, Mark quickly picked up his pace in the subsequent running segments, consistently outpacing the average times. This suggests that Mark has a strong runner profile and his stamina and pacing abilities are commendable.
While Mark's overall performance was strong, there were a few segments that could benefit from focused training and improvement:
Based on the analysis of Mark's performance, the following strategies could be beneficial for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Aljobory Wassam | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:18:35 | |
| Hyde Ryan | 2024 Dublin | 01:18:35 | |
| Robertson Calum | 2023 Manchester | 01:17:45 | |
| Hennig Swen | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:18:41 | |
| Ng Elden | 2024 Singapore | 01:18:07 | |
| Riediger Marcel | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:17:58 | |
| Foster Brad | 2024 Glasgow | 01:18:09 | |
| Savignard Julien | 2024 Marseille | 01:17:58 | |
| Fuentes Mark | 2022 Dallas | 01:18:40 | |
| Forster Lee | 2024 Glasgow | 01:18:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:19:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
