Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:45 (From 46:35 to 42:50) | 73.3% |
| BBJ | 00:38 (From 05:55 to 05:17) | 12.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 (From 02:29 to 02:07) | 7.2% |
| Rowing | 00:15 (From 05:03 to 04:48) | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 (From 04:33 to 04:26) | 2.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:18 to 02:18) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:36 to 04:36) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:22 to 04:22) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 06:06 to 06:06) | 0.0% |
| Van Der Hidde Stijn | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:46 | 00:00 | 04:44 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 03:46 | 04:29 +00:04 | 04:44 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 08:19 | 05:06 +00:21 | 09:13 -00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:18 | 13:46 | 03:00 -00:42 | 14:19 -00:33 |
| Running 3 | 05:57 | 16:04 | 05:32 +00:25 | 17:19 -01:15 |
| Sled Pull | 04:36 | 22:01 | 05:07 -00:31 | 22:51 -00:50 |
| Running 4 | 06:06 | 26:37 | 05:32 +00:34 | 27:58 -01:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:55 | 32:43 | 05:38 +00:17 | 33:30 -00:47 |
| Running 5 | 06:12 | 38:38 | 05:42 +00:30 | 39:08 -00:30 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 44:50 | 04:53 +00:10 | 44:50 +00:00 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 49:53 | 05:34 +00:25 | 49:43 +00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 55:52 | 02:15 +00:14 | 55:17 +00:35 |
| Running 7 | 06:01 | 58:21 | 05:32 +00:29 | 57:32 +00:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:22 | 01:04:22 | 05:21 -00:59 | 01:03:04 +01:18 |
| Running 8 | 07:10 | 01:08:44 | 06:13 +00:57 | 01:08:25 +00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 06:06 | 01:15:54 | 06:48 -00:42 | 01:14:38 +01:16 |
| Roxzone | 06:44 | 01:28:35 | 07:09 -00:25 | 01:28:35 |
Stijn Van Der Hidde, in the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX event, placed in the top 37% of all participants and top 39% in his age group. This is a commendable achievement, particularly given the competitive field. A comprehensive look at his performance shows that his strength lies in his ability to push and pull sleds, perform sandbag lunges, and execute wall balls efficiently, as evidenced by his faster-than-average times in these areas.
However, running appears to be an area of challenge for Stijn. His total running time was slower than the average by 02:22, indicating a greater strength profile rather than a runner profile. He started off strong in the first running segment, being faster than average, but his pace gradually decreased in the subsequent segments.
To enhance race performance, Stijn should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Drogt Gerwin | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:29:00 | |
| Healy Mark | 2024 Dublin | 01:29:00 | |
| Landry Joe | 2023 Manchester | 01:28:52 | |
| Barascud Thomas | 2024 Marseille | 01:28:37 | |
| Roche Niall | 2023 Dublin | 01:28:39 | |
| Aicon Javier | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:28:37 | |
| Gassen Niko | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:28:42 | |
| Jonczyński Karol | 2024 Poznan | 01:28:49 | |
| Baker Stephen | 2023 Paris | 01:28:24 | |
| Engbersen Wanja | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:28:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht Van Der Hidde Stijn | 01:39:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Van Der Hidde Stijn
