Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Rogers Karen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rogers Karen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rogers Karen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rogers Karen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
04:29.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Karen Rogers showcased remarkable athleticism at the 2024 Manchester HYROX, finishing in the top 10% of all athletes and top 7% in her age group, which is an exceptional achievement. Her overall time of 01:22:45 indicates a well-prepared and resilient competitor. Notably, Karen's strength segments, particularly the Sled Push, Burpees Broad Jump, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls, were significantly faster than average, showcasing her proficiency in strength-based challenges. However, her total running time was 02:15 slower than the average, suggesting a potential area for improvement. Her pacing across the running segments indicates a consistent approach with slight variances from the average times, suggesting she maintains a steady pace but may benefit from increased running efficiency or speed. Her profile leans towards a hybrid, with a slight inclination towards strength, highlighting the need to balance her running performance to complement her strength capabilities.
Segments to Improve:
Total Running Time: Karen's overall running time was slower than average, indicating room for improvement in her running efficiency and speed. Focusing on interval training, such as 400 to 800-meter repeats at a pace faster than her race pace, can help improve her VO2 max and running economy. Incorporating hill sprints and tempo runs into her training regimen can also enhance her endurance and speed. Additionally, technique drills focusing on stride length and cadence can make her running form more efficient.
Running 1 and Running 6: These segments were among her slowest in comparison to the average times. To improve, Karen should incorporate progressive warm-ups that mimic race intensity to ensure she starts at an optimal pace. For Running 6, fatigue management strategies, such as dynamic stretching and strategic nutrition/hydration during the race, can help maintain performance in later stages.
Race Strategies:
Pacing: Karen should consider a more dynamic pacing strategy that allows for flexibility based on the race segment. Specifically, slightly conserving energy during the initial running segments could allow for a stronger finish. Using a heart rate monitor or a smartwatch to keep track of her exertion levels in real-time can help maintain an optimal pace throughout the race.
Transition Efficiency (Roxzone): Although Karen's Roxzone time was slightly faster than average, minimizing transition times further can contribute significantly to overall performance. Practicing quick transitions between running and strength exercises in training can help. This includes setting up mock transition zones to simulate race conditions, improving both physical readiness and mental preparedness for swift changes in activity.
Strength and Running Balance: Given Karen's stronger performance in strength segments, integrating a balanced training approach that does not neglect her running capabilities is crucial. Cross-training activities such as cycling or swimming can improve cardiovascular endurance without the added impact of running, aiding in recovery and overall fitness. Additionally, incorporating plyometric exercises can enhance explosive power, beneficial for both strength and speed in running.
Conclusively, Karen has demonstrated impressive capabilities and with focused training on her identified areas of improvement, particularly her running efficiency and endurance, she has the potential to enhance her overall HYROX performance. Tailoring her training to address these specifics while maintaining her strength will make her a more rounded and competitive athlete in future races.