Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Huis Dynand's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Huis Dynand's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Huis Dynand's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Huis Dynand's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:23 | 06:25 to 05:02 | 34.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:50 | 06:05 to 05:15 | 21.0% |
| Run Total | 00:30 | 44:24 to 43:54 | 12.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 03:22 to 02:57 | 10.5% |
| Rowing | 00:23 | 05:15 to 04:52 | 9.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 | 02:35 to 02:12 | 9.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:33 to 04:29 | 1.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:28 to 05:28 | 0.0% |
| Van Huis Dynand | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:43 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 04:43 | 04:31 +00:02 | 04:46 -00:03 |
| Running 2 | 05:11 | 09:16 | 05:11 +00:00 | 09:17 -00:01 |
| Sled Push | 03:22 | 14:27 | 03:04 +00:18 | 14:28 -00:01 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 17:49 | 05:40 -00:12 | 17:32 +00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 06:25 | 23:17 | 05:17 +01:08 | 23:12 +00:05 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 29:42 | 05:38 +00:00 | 28:29 +01:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:26 | 35:20 | 05:49 -00:23 | 34:07 +01:13 |
| Running 5 | 05:49 | 40:46 | 05:51 -00:02 | 39:56 +00:50 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 46:35 | 04:56 +00:19 | 45:47 +00:48 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 51:50 | 05:41 -00:05 | 50:43 +01:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:35 | 57:26 | 02:18 +00:17 | 56:24 +01:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 01:00:01 | 05:39 +00:03 | 58:42 +01:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:05 | 01:05:43 | 05:30 +00:35 | 01:04:21 +01:22 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:11:48 | 06:23 -00:03 | 01:09:51 +01:57 |
| Wall Balls | 05:28 | 01:18:08 | 07:05 -01:37 | 01:16:14 +01:54 |
| Roxzone | 07:20 | 01:30:50 | 07:31 -00:11 | 01:30:50 |
Based on the splits analysis, Dynand's best running lap was 00:04:43, and his running segments were generally slower than average. However, he performed well in the sled push segment, completing it in 00:03:22, which was 00:02 faster than average. He also had a faster time in the sled pull segment compared to the average.
Additionally, Dynand should consider incorporating specific training sessions that target his weaker areas, such as sled pulls and sandbag lunges. By dedicating focused training sessions to these segments, he can improve his performance and build the necessary strength and endurance.
Overall, Dynand has a balanced profile with strengths in certain segments and areas for improvement in others. By following the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can enhance his performance in the identified areas and continue to improve his overall fitness and race results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Evans William | 2024 Stockholm | 01:30:52 | |
| Alvarado Daniel | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:30:52 | |
| Donohue Kevin | 2024 New York | 01:30:24 | |
| Wdowiak Daniel | 2024 Katowice | 01:31:17 | |
| Vara Royuela Victor | 2023 Madrid | 01:30:28 | |
| Kupka Krzysztof | 2024 Katowice | 01:31:08 | |
| Kelly Jason | 2024 Glasgow | 01:31:05 | |
| Van Eck Joost | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:30:34 | |
| Roth Adrian | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:30:49 | |
| Wind Jur | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:30:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:18:20 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:05 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
