Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Quakernaat Anne's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Quakernaat Anne hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Quakernaat Anne’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Quakernaat Anne's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:49 | 52:13 to 46:24 | 80.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:25 | 07:31 to 06:06 | 19.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:30 to 03:30 | 0.0% |
| Quakernaat Anne | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:50 | 00:00 | 05:16 +01:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:01 | 06:50 | 05:10 -00:09 | 05:16 +01:34 |
| Running 2 | 06:10 | 11:51 | 05:37 +00:33 | 10:26 +01:25 |
| Sled Push | 01:45 | 18:01 | 02:50 -01:05 | 16:03 +01:58 |
| Running 3 | 06:21 | 19:46 | 05:53 +00:28 | 18:53 +00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 04:55 | 26:07 | 05:58 -01:03 | 24:46 +01:21 |
| Running 4 | 06:27 | 31:02 | 05:57 +00:30 | 30:44 +00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:31 | 37:29 | 06:29 +01:02 | 36:41 +00:48 |
| Running 5 | 06:31 | 45:00 | 06:07 +00:24 | 43:10 +01:50 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 51:31 | 05:27 -00:23 | 49:17 +02:14 |
| Running 6 | 06:28 | 56:35 | 06:00 +00:28 | 54:44 +01:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 01:03:03 | 02:18 -00:15 | 01:00:44 +02:19 |
| Running 7 | 06:28 | 01:05:06 | 05:57 +00:31 | 01:03:02 +02:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 01:11:34 | 05:01 -00:32 | 01:08:59 +02:35 |
| Running 8 | 07:01 | 01:16:03 | 06:28 +00:33 | 01:14:00 +02:03 |
| Wall Balls | 03:30 | 01:23:04 | 05:12 -01:42 | 01:20:28 +02:36 |
| Roxzone | 06:31 | 01:32:59 | 07:19 -00:48 | 01:32:59 |
Anne's overall time of 01:32:59 was solid, but there are areas where she can improve to enhance her performance in future races. Her total running time of 00:52:13 was 05:55 slower than the average for her finish time. This suggests that Anne could benefit from improving her overall fitness and transitioning between exercise zones more efficiently.
It's worth noting that Anne's best running lap time of 00:06:10 was impressive and indicates that she has good running capabilities. However, her overall running performance could be enhanced by focusing on specific training strategies.
Overall, Anne Quakernaat performed well in the 2024 Maastricht Hyrox race. By focusing on the areas of improvement identified above and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, she can further enhance her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wysocka Katarzyna | 2024 Poznan | 01:33:15 | |
| Prade Dorothee | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:32:48 | |
| Foster Laura | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:33:11 | |
| Clark Jada | 2024 Houston | 01:32:44 | |
| Jones Fleur | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:53 | |
| Hopmans Sieneke | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:33:29 | |
| Ottevanger Karin | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:33:25 | |
| La Versa Chiara | 2024 Milan | 01:32:51 | |
| Garcia Estefania | 2024 Poznan | 01:33:08 | |
| Hüsken Marlene | 2022 Essen | 01:33:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:38:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
