Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 233 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Plantinga Jannick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Plantinga Jannick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Plantinga Jannick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Plantinga Jannick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:50 | 33:06 to 31:16 | 56.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:32 | 02:55 to 02:23 | 16.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:18 | 04:46 to 04:28 | 9.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 | 03:41 to 03:25 | 8.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 01:47 to 01:32 | 7.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 03:53 to 03:49 | 2.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:41 to 02:41 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Plantinga Jannick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:10 | 00:00 | 03:26 +00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:53 | 04:10 | 03:54 -00:01 | 03:26 +00:44 |
| Running 2 | 03:50 | 08:03 | 03:47 +00:03 | 07:20 +00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:55 | 11:53 | 02:52 +00:03 | 11:07 +00:46 |
| Running 3 | 03:58 | 14:48 | 04:01 -00:03 | 13:59 +00:49 |
| Sled Pull | 03:56 | 18:46 | 04:16 -00:20 | 18:00 +00:46 |
| Running 4 | 04:01 | 22:42 | 04:04 -00:03 | 22:16 +00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:41 | 26:43 | 02:58 -00:17 | 26:20 +00:23 |
| Running 5 | 04:08 | 29:24 | 04:08 +00:00 | 29:18 +00:06 |
| Rowing | 04:01 | 33:32 | 04:08 -00:07 | 33:26 +00:06 |
| Running 6 | 04:11 | 37:33 | 04:05 +00:06 | 37:34 -00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:47 | 41:44 | 01:40 +00:07 | 41:39 +00:05 |
| Running 7 | 04:13 | 43:31 | 04:06 +00:07 | 43:19 +00:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:41 | 47:44 | 03:39 +00:02 | 47:25 +00:19 |
| Running 8 | 04:38 | 51:25 | 04:22 +00:16 | 51:04 +00:21 |
| Wall Balls | 04:46 | 56:03 | 04:47 -00:01 | 55:26 +00:37 |
| Roxzone | 03:33 | 01:04:14 | 04:01 -00:28 | 01:04:14 |
When analyzing the splits, it is evident that Jannick performed well in certain segments, such as the Ski Erg and the Burpees Broad Jump, where he was faster than the average time by 7 and 23 seconds, respectively. However, there were also segments where he struggled, such as the Running 1, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Wall Balls, and Running 8, where he was slower than the average time.
In conclusion, Jannick Plantinga performed well in the 2024 Maastricht HYROX race, achieving a top 10 overall rank and a top 2 rank in his age group. To further improve his performance, he should focus on the identified areas of improvement, particularly in the Running 1, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Wall Balls, and Running 8 segments. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and efficient transitions, he can enhance his performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ulajew Dimitri | 2022 Maastricht | 01:03:56 | |
| Watkins Barry | 2024 Dublin | 01:04:01 | |
| Krüger Julian | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:04:43 | |
| Themann Hendrik | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:04:38 | |
| Bannasch Jan | 2023 Hamburg | 01:04:19 | |
| Melheim Oscar Adrian | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:04:19 | |
| Hancock Fenton | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:03:49 | |
| Mendez de la maza Jeronimo | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:04:14 | |
| Muscart James | 2022 Berlin | 01:04:32 | |
| Manthey Bjoern | 2019 Essen | 01:04:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:02:51 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:10:53 | |
| 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:01:29 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 00:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
