Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Boogaard Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Boogaard Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Boogaard Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Boogaard Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:26 | 47:48 to 43:22 | 88.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:32 | 02:42 to 02:10 | 10.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:30 to 04:28 | 0.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:40 to 02:40 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:04 to 06:04 | 0.0% |
| Boogaard Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:06 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 05:06 | 04:30 +00:00 | 04:47 +00:19 |
| Running 2 | 05:14 | 09:36 | 05:06 +00:08 | 09:17 +00:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 14:50 | 03:02 -00:22 | 14:23 +00:27 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 17:30 | 05:34 +00:15 | 17:25 +00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 04:45 | 23:19 | 05:12 -00:27 | 22:59 +00:20 |
| Running 4 | 08:37 | 28:04 | 05:33 +03:04 | 28:11 -00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:33 | 36:41 | 05:42 -01:09 | 33:44 +02:57 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 41:14 | 05:44 -00:07 | 39:26 +01:48 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 46:51 | 04:53 -00:03 | 45:10 +01:41 |
| Running 6 | 05:35 | 51:41 | 05:34 +00:01 | 50:03 +01:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:42 | 57:16 | 02:17 +00:25 | 55:37 +01:39 |
| Running 7 | 05:39 | 59:58 | 05:34 +00:05 | 57:54 +02:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:46 | 01:05:37 | 05:24 -00:38 | 01:03:28 +02:09 |
| Running 8 | 06:14 | 01:10:23 | 06:15 -00:01 | 01:08:52 +01:31 |
| Wall Balls | 06:04 | 01:16:37 | 06:53 -00:49 | 01:15:07 +01:30 |
| Roxzone | 06:47 | 01:29:22 | 07:22 -00:35 | 01:29:22 |
Nick Boogaard's performance in the 2024 Rotterdam HYROX race places him solidly within the top echelons of his age group and overall, indicating a commendable level of fitness and competitive spirit. His overall time and ranks suggest a balanced athlete with proficiencies in both strength and endurance components, though with a slight inclination towards strength-based events, as evidenced by faster-than-average performances in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls. However, Nick's total running time being slower than average by 03:11 minutes points towards an area ripe for improvement, potentially impacting his overall standing. The considerable slowdown in Running 4 suggests pacing issues, possibly starting too aggressively and struggling to maintain optimal speed in later stages.
In conclusion, Nick Boogaard has demonstrated strong potential in the HYROX race, with specific opportunities for improvement in his running performance, farmer's carry, and transition times. With targeted training, strategic pacing, and a focus on recovery and nutrition, Nick can expect to see significant improvements in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kornelson Rik | 2023 Warschau | 01:29:20 | |
| Isnart Benjamin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:29:28 | |
| Baker Bjorn | 2024 Sydney | 01:28:55 | |
| Sestan Robert | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:28 | |
| Lilburn Andrew | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:14 | |
| Price Rob | 2024 Malaga | 01:29:24 | |
| Bridges Paul | 2021 Birmingham | 01:29:32 | |
| Cahill Ellis | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:47 | |
| O Hare Chris | 2023 Dublin | 01:29:25 | |
| Tinga Finn | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
