Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Franco Louise's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Franco Louise's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Franco Louise's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Franco Louise's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:19 | 49:58 to 47:39 | 44.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:22 | 06:22 to 05:00 | 26.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:54 | 06:46 to 05:52 | 17.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:39 | 07:06 to 06:27 | 12.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Franco Louise | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:25 | 00:00 | 05:21 +00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 05:25 | 05:13 -00:20 | 05:21 +00:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:47 | 10:18 | 05:46 +00:01 | 10:34 -00:16 |
| Sled Push | 01:51 | 16:05 | 02:52 -01:01 | 16:20 -00:15 |
| Running 3 | 06:04 | 17:56 | 06:05 -00:01 | 19:12 -01:16 |
| Sled Pull | 06:46 | 24:00 | 06:08 +00:38 | 25:17 -01:17 |
| Running 4 | 06:29 | 30:46 | 06:06 +00:23 | 31:25 -00:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:06 | 37:15 | 06:41 +00:25 | 37:31 -00:16 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 44:21 | 06:15 +00:19 | 44:12 +00:09 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 50:55 | 05:30 -00:04 | 50:27 +00:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:30 | 56:21 | 06:08 +00:22 | 55:57 +00:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 01:02:51 | 02:23 -00:18 | 01:02:05 +00:46 |
| Running 7 | 06:16 | 01:04:56 | 06:07 +00:09 | 01:04:28 +00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:22 | 01:11:12 | 05:09 +01:13 | 01:10:35 +00:37 |
| Running 8 | 06:56 | 01:17:34 | 06:40 +00:16 | 01:15:44 +01:50 |
| Wall Balls | 03:51 | 01:24:30 | 05:28 -01:37 | 01:22:24 +02:06 |
| Roxzone | 07:13 | 01:35:27 | 07:35 -00:22 | 01:35:27 |
Louise Franco delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing a commendable overall rank within the top 23% of all participants and placing 19% within her age group. Notably, her strength-based exercises, such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls, were significantly faster than the average, showcasing her strong strength profile. However, her total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting that running endurance could be an area of improvement. Additionally, her race pacing was consistent, though some running segments were slower, indicating potential fatigue or the need for better pacing strategies.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Morin Elea | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:35:48 | |
| Mellett Linzi | 2024 Manchester | 01:35:56 | |
| Meijer Lisette | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:35:23 | |
| Rodgers Sara | 2024 Dublin | 01:35:23 | |
| Garrett Kathy | 2024 Anaheim | 01:35:34 | |
| Gurton Jade | 2024 Malaga | 01:35:38 | |
| Worrall Emily | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:35:44 | |
| King Sharni | 2023 Sydney | 01:35:02 | |
| Gubbels Denise | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:35:30 | |
| De Wiljes Anne | 2019 Hamburg | 01:35:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
