Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Brown Nigel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Brown Nigel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Brown Nigel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Brown Nigel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:01 | 55:19 to 46:18 | 97.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:51 to 04:36 | 2.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:47 to 02:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:34 to 01:34 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Brown Nigel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:48 | 00:00 | 04:59 -00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 04:48 | 04:36 +00:15 | 04:59 -00:11 |
| Running 2 | 06:29 | 09:39 | 05:24 +01:05 | 09:35 +00:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:47 | 16:08 | 03:14 -00:27 | 14:59 +01:09 |
| Running 3 | 07:07 | 18:55 | 05:55 +01:12 | 18:13 +00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 05:08 | 26:02 | 05:38 -00:30 | 24:08 +01:54 |
| Running 4 | 06:44 | 31:10 | 05:54 +00:50 | 29:46 +01:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:14 | 37:54 | 06:21 -02:07 | 35:40 +02:14 |
| Running 5 | 07:09 | 42:08 | 06:08 +01:01 | 42:01 +00:07 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 49:17 | 05:03 -00:25 | 48:09 +01:08 |
| Running 6 | 06:58 | 53:55 | 05:57 +01:01 | 53:12 +00:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:34 | 01:00:53 | 02:26 -00:52 | 59:09 +01:44 |
| Running 7 | 07:12 | 01:02:27 | 05:56 +01:16 | 01:01:35 +00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:59 | 01:09:39 | 05:54 -00:55 | 01:07:31 +02:08 |
| Running 8 | 08:55 | 01:14:38 | 06:48 +02:07 | 01:13:25 +01:13 |
| Wall Balls | 05:35 | 01:23:33 | 07:42 -02:07 | 01:20:13 +03:20 |
| Roxzone | 07:08 | 01:36:09 | 08:14 -01:06 | 01:36:09 |
Nigel's total running time of 00:55:19 is 09:30 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he could improve his running speed and efficiency to enhance his overall performance. It is advisable for Nigel to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time to minimize the time spent in the roxzone.
In conclusion, Nigel Brown's performance in the 2023 Birmingham Hyrox race was commendable. To further enhance his performance, Nigel should focus on improving his running speed and efficiency, as well as his overall fitness and transition time. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength training, and mental preparation, Nigel can continue to improve and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Murray Ronan | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:26 | |
| Lersch Michael | 2022 Essen | 01:36:21 | |
| Chuluunbaatar Jav | 2024 London | 01:35:43 | |
| Van Den Berg Maarten | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:44 | |
| Denman Paul | 2023 Melbourne | 01:35:53 | |
| Morandin Luca | 2024 Milan | 01:36:21 | |
| Orozco García Mariano | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:36:32 | |
| Dumas Tim | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:35:45 | |
| Tan Pau Boon Jamie | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:36:32 | |
| Röhrborn David | 2021 Leipzig | 01:36:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:44:24 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
