Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ter Steege Lars's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ter Steege Lars's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ter Steege Lars's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ter Steege Lars's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:07 | 05:37 to 04:30 | 32.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:00 | 06:30 to 05:30 | 28.8% |
| Rowing | 00:30 | 05:06 to 04:36 | 14.4% |
| Run Total | 00:28 | 39:54 to 39:26 | 13.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:17 | 02:45 to 02:28 | 8.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:00 to 01:54 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Ter Steege Lars | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:18 | 00:00 | 04:23 -01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 03:18 | 04:21 -00:07 | 04:23 -01:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 07:32 | 04:44 +00:01 | 08:44 -01:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 12:17 | 02:45 +00:00 | 13:28 -01:11 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 15:02 | 05:07 -00:09 | 16:13 -01:11 |
| Sled Pull | 04:01 | 20:00 | 04:35 -00:34 | 21:20 -01:20 |
| Running 4 | 05:06 | 24:01 | 05:06 +00:00 | 25:55 -01:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:37 | 29:07 | 04:54 +00:43 | 31:01 -01:54 |
| Running 5 | 05:44 | 34:44 | 05:15 +00:29 | 35:55 -01:11 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 40:28 | 04:41 +00:25 | 41:10 -00:42 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 45:34 | 05:08 -00:05 | 45:51 -00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 50:37 | 02:04 -00:04 | 50:59 -00:22 |
| Running 7 | 04:59 | 52:37 | 05:07 -00:08 | 53:03 -00:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:10 | 57:36 | 04:45 -00:35 | 58:10 -00:34 |
| Running 8 | 06:04 | 01:01:46 | 05:35 +00:29 | 01:02:55 -01:09 |
| Wall Balls | 06:30 | 01:07:50 | 05:58 +00:32 | 01:08:30 -00:40 |
| Roxzone | 06:28 | 01:20:42 | 06:14 +00:14 | 01:20:42 |
Lars Ter Steege demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 24% overall and top 26% within his age group. Notably, his total running time of 39:54 was 59 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. His initial running segments suggest a fast start, particularly with Running 1 being significantly faster than average, placing him in the 4th percentile. However, there was a noticeable decline in speed during the latter running segments, likely due to fatigue from strength-based exercises. This indicates that Lars is primarily a strong runner, but could benefit from enhanced strength conditioning to maintain speed across the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hollinshead Andrew | 2022 Birmingham | 01:21:10 | |
| Briody Gordon | 2024 Poznan | 01:21:09 | |
| Broks Raitis | 2024 Katowice | 01:20:33 | |
| Guisado Sánchez Alvaro | 2024 Malaga | 01:21:05 | |
| Harding Dan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:14 | |
| Lopez Juanka | 2024 Malaga | 01:20:15 | |
| Fernández Diez Carlos | 2023 Madrid | 01:20:51 | |
| Alting Van Geusau Xavier | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:20:57 | |
| Brewczynski Cody | 2024 Perth | 01:20:48 | |
| Meerschaut Jonas | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:20:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:27:50 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
