Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
11:57.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Norman Schilt delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking within the top 46% overall and top 48% within his age group. His strengths were evident in most strength-based exercises, particularly in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, and Sandbag Lunges, where he consistently outperformed average times. However, his total running time was significantly slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in running endurance and speed. His initial running segments suggest he started at a moderate pace, which then slowed considerably, particularly in later segments, highlighting a potential issue with endurance. Based on his performance, Norman appears to have a strength-oriented profile with room to develop his running capabilities.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time:
Norman's total running time was 9:57 slower than average. To address this, focusing on improving running endurance and speed is crucial.
Training Strategy: Incorporate interval training and tempo runs into weekly routines to build speed and endurance. For example, 400m repeats at a challenging pace with short recovery periods can enhance speed and stamina.
Drills: Incorporate running drills such as high knees and butt kicks to improve running form and efficiency.
Strength-Running Balance: Include compromised running workouts, where running is interspersed with strength exercises, to simulate race conditions and improve transitions from strength to running segments.
Ski Erg:
This segment was 17 seconds slower than average. Improving technique and efficiency can help reduce time.
Training Strategy: Focus on technique drills to improve the pull phase, ensuring a powerful yet efficient stroke.
Exercises: Strengthen core and upper body with exercises like rowing machine intervals, pull-ups, and core stability workouts to enhance overall ski erg performance.
Race Strategies
Energy Management: Implement a pacing strategy that avoids early fatigue. Begin at a sustainable pace and gradually increase speed as the race progresses.
Roxzone Efficiency: With a faster than average roxzone time, continue to optimize transitions between exercises by minimizing rest and maintaining focus on the upcoming segment.
Nutrition and Hydration: Ensure a well-planned nutrition strategy that supports sustained energy release throughout the race. Practice this during training to find what works best.
Mental Preparation: Develop mental resilience techniques, such as visualization and positive self-talk, to maintain focus and motivation during challenging segments.