Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nobbe Michael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nobbe Michael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nobbe Michael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nobbe Michael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:48 | 49:28 to 45:40 | 69.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:36 | 07:11 to 05:35 | 29.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:05 | 07:14 to 07:09 | 1.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Nobbe Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:24 | 00:00 | 04:59 +00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 05:24 | 04:35 -00:02 | 04:59 +00:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:49 | 09:57 | 05:23 +00:26 | 09:34 +00:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:21 | 15:46 | 03:11 -00:50 | 14:57 +00:49 |
| Running 3 | 06:08 | 18:07 | 05:53 +00:15 | 18:08 -00:01 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 24:15 | 05:30 -00:49 | 24:01 +00:14 |
| Running 4 | 06:18 | 28:56 | 05:52 +00:26 | 29:31 -00:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:56 | 35:14 | 06:11 -01:15 | 35:23 -00:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:28 | 40:10 | 06:04 +00:24 | 41:34 -01:24 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 46:38 | 05:01 -00:05 | 47:38 -01:00 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 51:34 | 05:54 +00:02 | 52:39 -01:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:45 | 57:30 | 02:24 -00:39 | 58:33 -01:03 |
| Running 7 | 06:00 | 59:15 | 05:53 +00:07 | 01:00:57 -01:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:11 | 01:05:15 | 05:48 +01:23 | 01:06:50 -01:35 |
| Running 8 | 07:30 | 01:12:26 | 06:46 +00:44 | 01:12:38 -00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 07:14 | 01:19:56 | 07:27 -00:13 | 01:19:24 +00:32 |
| Roxzone | 07:52 | 01:34:53 | 08:02 -00:10 | 01:34:53 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on the splits analysis, Michael's overall running time of 00:49:28 was 04:43 slower than the average. This suggests that he may need to focus more on improving his running performance. However, it's worth noting that his best running lap was 00:05:24, which was only 00:38 slower than the average. This indicates that he has the potential to perform well in running segments with the right training strategies.
In conclusion, Michael Nobbe performed well in the HYROX race in Karlsruhe, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his running performance, particularly in the identified segments, incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, and implementing effective race strategies, he can optimize his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Anes Timothy | 2024 Houston | 01:34:54 | |
| Tran Michael | 2021 Dallas | 01:34:55 | |
| GONCALVES DIOGO | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:35:15 | |
| Kok Remco | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:31 | |
| Horn Regan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:36 | |
| Nowaczyk Leszek | 2023 London | 01:34:47 | |
| Quinn Mark | 2024 Melbourne | 01:35:19 | |
| Odegard Scott | 2023 Anaheim | 01:35:21 | |
| Kelly Ryan | 2024 Dublin | 01:34:42 | |
| Scott Stanley | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:34:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
