Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Quinn Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Quinn Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Quinn Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Quinn Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:02 | 08:02 to 06:00 | 37.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:42 | 08:54 to 07:12 | 30.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:42 | 06:20 to 05:38 | 12.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:28 | 05:51 to 05:23 | 8.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:40 to 02:20 | 6.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:43 to 04:35 | 2.4% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:07 to 04:59 | 2.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:40 to 43:40 | 0.0% |
| Quinn Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 04:51 | 04:35 +00:08 | 04:58 -00:07 |
| Running 2 | 04:57 | 09:34 | 05:24 -00:27 | 09:33 +00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 14:31 | 03:12 -00:56 | 14:57 -00:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:21 | 16:47 | 05:51 -00:30 | 18:09 -01:22 |
| Sled Pull | 05:51 | 22:08 | 05:33 +00:18 | 24:00 -01:52 |
| Running 4 | 05:21 | 27:59 | 05:52 -00:31 | 29:33 -01:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:02 | 33:20 | 06:15 +01:47 | 35:25 -02:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 41:22 | 06:06 -00:30 | 41:40 -00:18 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 46:58 | 05:02 +00:05 | 47:46 -00:48 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 52:05 | 05:54 -00:24 | 52:48 -00:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:40 | 57:35 | 02:25 +00:15 | 58:42 -01:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 01:00:15 | 05:53 -00:34 | 01:01:07 -00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:20 | 01:05:34 | 05:51 +00:29 | 01:07:00 -01:26 |
| Running 8 | 06:48 | 01:11:54 | 06:50 -00:02 | 01:12:51 -00:57 |
| Wall Balls | 08:54 | 01:18:42 | 07:32 +01:22 | 01:19:41 -00:59 |
| Roxzone | 07:50 | 01:35:19 | 08:06 -00:16 | 01:35:19 |
Mark Quinn demonstrated a solid performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, finishing with an overall rank of 817 out of 1801 athletes, placing him in the top 45%. He was ranked 63rd in his age group (45-49), positioning him in the top 51% of his category. His overall time was 01:35:19, which is commendable for this challenging event.
Quinn's total running time of 00:43:40 was 03:31 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Despite a few slower segments, his running laps consistently outperformed the average, suggesting that he started at a steady pace without burning out too quickly. This consistency reflects an athlete with a solid endurance base and efficient pacing strategy, particularly strong in running compared to strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Muir Andrew | 2024 Glasgow | 01:34:53 | |
| Kohlhofer Wolfgang | 2019 Wien | 01:35:20 | |
| NicolettiDowd Ryan | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:35:00 | |
| Cho Namyul | 2024 Incheon | 01:35:30 | |
| Winkler Florian | 2022 Leipzig | 01:34:51 | |
| Jones Dean | 2022 Bremen | 01:34:53 | |
| Laubscher Dwayne | 2024 Cape Town | 01:35:00 | |
| Conter Philip | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:35:06 | |
| Jansen Joost | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:34:50 | |
| Sandhu Suki | 2024 Berlin | 01:35:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
