Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcclean Owen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcclean Owen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcclean Owen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcclean Owen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:12 | 07:29 to 05:17 | 54.8% |
| Sled Pull | 01:03 | 05:54 to 04:51 | 26.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:20 | 03:10 to 02:50 | 8.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:40 to 04:26 | 5.8% |
| Run Total | 00:10 | 43:01 to 42:51 | 4.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:09 to 02:07 | 0.8% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:41 to 05:41 | 0.0% |
| Mcclean Owen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:44 | 00:00 | 04:43 +00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 04:44 | 04:29 +00:11 | 04:43 +00:01 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 09:24 | 05:05 +00:11 | 09:12 +00:12 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 14:40 | 02:59 +00:11 | 14:17 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:26 | 17:50 | 05:33 -00:07 | 17:16 +00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 05:54 | 23:16 | 05:06 +00:48 | 22:49 +00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 29:10 | 05:32 -00:04 | 27:55 +01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:29 | 34:38 | 05:36 +01:53 | 33:27 +01:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 42:07 | 05:42 -00:18 | 39:03 +03:04 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 47:31 | 04:52 -00:04 | 44:45 +02:46 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 52:19 | 05:34 -00:04 | 49:37 +02:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 57:49 | 02:15 -00:06 | 55:11 +02:38 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 59:58 | 05:33 -00:13 | 57:26 +02:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:50 | 01:05:18 | 05:21 -00:31 | 01:02:59 +02:19 |
| Running 8 | 05:57 | 01:10:08 | 06:12 -00:15 | 01:08:20 +01:48 |
| Wall Balls | 05:41 | 01:16:05 | 06:47 -01:06 | 01:14:32 +01:33 |
| Roxzone | 06:49 | 01:28:27 | 07:08 -00:19 | 01:28:27 |
Owen McClean demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Paris Hyrox race. Finishing in the top 56% of 1579 athletes and in the top 57% of his age group, Owen proved his competitive edge and significant potential. Notably, his total running time of 43:01 was 01:03 faster than the average, suggesting his strength lies in running. As for his pacing, Owen started the race slightly slower than average but gradually improved his speed, showcasing his well-executed strategy of conserving energy for the latter part of the race.
In future races, Owen should aim to start at a slightly faster pace to make up for time in the later segments where he tends to slow down. Since Owen has shown strength in running, he should capitalise on these segments to make up for time lost in strength-based exercises. Additionally, Owen should focus on improving his transition times between exercises to reduce the roxzone time. Lastly, incorporating a comprehensive warm-up routine before the race can help prepare his muscles for the intense effort and potentially improve his overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dunning Paul | 2024 Glasgow | 01:28:05 | |
| Mariano Gabriele | 2024 Milan | 01:28:48 | |
| Herrmann Andrew | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:40 | |
| Röhl Nils | 2019 Hamburg | 01:28:13 | |
| Sheorajpanday Akshay | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:28:15 | |
| Bantin Doc | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:28:51 | |
| Lazic Vladimir | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:28:02 | |
| Fulton Darren | 2024 Dublin | 01:27:58 | |
| Lim Chris | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:28:09 | |
| Schneider Johann | 2023 München | 01:28:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:49 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
