Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kershaw George's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kershaw George's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kershaw George's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kershaw George's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:57 | 35:42 to 33:45 | 42.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:43 | 04:59 to 03:16 | 37.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 03:56 to 03:29 | 9.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 02:19 to 01:54 | 9.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:02 to 04:00 | 0.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:02 | 04:19 to 04:17 | 0.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:13 to 03:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:28 to 01:28 | 0.0% |
| Kershaw George | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:03 | 00:00 | 03:53 -00:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 03:03 | 04:09 -00:07 | 03:53 -00:50 |
| Running 2 | 04:27 | 07:05 | 04:07 +00:20 | 08:02 -00:57 |
| Sled Push | 02:19 | 11:32 | 02:23 -00:04 | 12:09 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 04:36 | 13:51 | 04:24 +00:12 | 14:32 -00:41 |
| Sled Pull | 03:13 | 18:27 | 03:48 -00:35 | 18:56 -00:29 |
| Running 4 | 04:32 | 21:40 | 04:24 +00:08 | 22:44 -01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:59 | 26:12 | 03:47 +01:12 | 27:08 -00:56 |
| Running 5 | 04:54 | 31:11 | 04:30 +00:24 | 30:55 +00:16 |
| Rowing | 04:09 | 36:05 | 04:24 -00:15 | 35:25 +00:40 |
| Running 6 | 04:36 | 40:14 | 04:25 +00:11 | 39:49 +00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:28 | 44:50 | 01:45 -00:17 | 44:14 +00:36 |
| Running 7 | 04:41 | 46:18 | 04:25 +00:16 | 45:59 +00:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:56 | 50:59 | 03:52 +00:04 | 50:24 +00:35 |
| Running 8 | 04:57 | 54:55 | 04:41 +00:16 | 54:16 +00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 04:19 | 59:52 | 04:50 -00:31 | 58:57 +00:55 |
| Roxzone | 04:28 | 01:08:31 | 04:44 -00:16 | 01:08:31 |
George Kershaw demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race, finishing in the top 13% of all 1203 athletes and in the top 17% of his age group (25-29). His overall time of 01:08:31 showcases his competitive edge and dedication towards his fitness. However, his total running time was 41 seconds slower than the average, indicating a need to focus more on his running training. Despite this, Kershaw managed to perform exceptionally well in the initial segments of the race, with his running 1 time being 48 seconds faster than the average. However, this fast start may have led to a slower pace in the following running segments. Moving forward, Kershaw should consider a more balanced pacing strategy to better distribute his energy throughout the race.
Considering Kershaw's performance, here are some race strategies that could be beneficial:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Clarke Russell | 2024 Manchester | 01:08:59 | |
| Mersch Matij | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:08:56 | |
| Rahimi Ali Reza | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:08:53 | |
| Hoegner Leonard | 2024 Marseille | 01:08:27 | |
| Arney Sean | 2024 Anaheim | 01:08:59 | |
| Van Dessel Jordi | 2024 Köln | 01:08:39 | |
| Lazenby Regan | 2024 Milan | 01:08:44 | |
| Shepherd Marcus | 2024 Birmingham | 01:08:34 | |
| Riley Sean | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:08:30 | |
| Murray Connor | 2024 Melbourne | 01:08:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:13:40 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
