Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 851 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hamill Scott's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hamill Scott's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hamill Scott's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hamill Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:45 | 11:22 to 06:37 | 82.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:36 | 06:55 to 06:19 | 10.4% |
| Run Total | 00:13 | 51:01 to 50:48 | 3.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:51 to 02:44 | 2.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:05 | 08:46 to 08:41 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:07 to 03:07 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:56 to 06:56 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Hamill Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:07 | 00:00 | 05:22 -01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 04:07 | 04:46 -00:21 | 05:22 -01:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:38 | 08:32 | 05:55 -00:17 | 10:08 -01:36 |
| Sled Push | 03:07 | 14:10 | 03:39 -00:32 | 16:03 -01:53 |
| Running 3 | 05:53 | 17:17 | 06:35 -00:42 | 19:42 -02:25 |
| Sled Pull | 06:55 | 23:10 | 06:25 +00:30 | 26:17 -03:07 |
| Running 4 | 06:06 | 30:05 | 06:33 -00:27 | 32:42 -02:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:56 | 36:11 | 07:24 -00:28 | 39:15 -03:04 |
| Running 5 | 06:35 | 43:07 | 06:50 -00:15 | 46:39 -03:32 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 49:42 | 05:16 -00:23 | 53:29 -03:47 |
| Running 6 | 06:58 | 54:35 | 06:38 +00:20 | 58:45 -04:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:51 | 01:01:33 | 02:40 +00:11 | 01:05:23 -03:50 |
| Running 7 | 07:04 | 01:04:24 | 06:36 +00:28 | 01:08:03 -03:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 11:22 | 01:11:28 | 06:51 +04:31 | 01:14:39 -03:11 |
| Running 8 | 08:43 | 01:22:50 | 08:04 +00:39 | 01:21:30 +01:20 |
| Wall Balls | 08:46 | 01:31:33 | 08:51 -00:05 | 01:29:34 +01:59 |
| Roxzone | 08:01 | 01:48:10 | 09:45 -01:44 | 01:48:10 |
Scott Hamill's performance in the 2024 Brisbane HYROX race was commendable, especially considering his age group. He ranked 522nd out of 1014 participants overall and 25th out of 47 in his age group. His total running time of 51:01 was 1:51 faster than average, indicating a solid running profile. However, a closer look at his pacing shows that he started the race strongly, with his first running segment being significantly faster than average. His initial burst might have affected his performance later in the race, suggesting that he may have started too fast. Scott's strength lies predominantly in his running ability, but he needs to balance this with improved strength performance, particularly in segments like Sandbag Lunges and Wall Balls.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Olsson Anders | 2023 Stockholm | 01:48:33 | |
| Turnbull Neil | 2023 Glasgow | 01:47:49 | |
| Abbott Maxwell | 2024 Singapore | 01:48:05 | |
| De Jong Johan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:48:08 | |
| Müller Jonas | 2022 Hamburg | 01:48:15 | |
| Liew Derrick | 2024 Melbourne | 01:47:58 | |
| Schapendonk Mike | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:48:37 | |
| Stadler Brad | 2024 New York | 01:48:11 | |
| Ferraro Daniele | 2024 Rimini | 01:48:20 | |
| Angulo Afonso Pablo | 2022 Madrid | 01:47:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
