Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 576 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:57 (From 12:18 to 09:21) | 40.0% |
| Sled Pull | 02:45 (From 09:29 to 06:44) | 37.2% |
| BBJ | 00:35 (From 08:17 to 07:42) | 7.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:34 (From 04:31 to 03:57) | 7.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 (From 03:22 to 02:53) | 6.5% |
| Rowing | 00:03 (From 05:26 to 05:23) | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:49 to 04:49) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 05:53 to 05:53) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 52:03 to 52:03) | 0.0% |
| White Marc | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:33 | 00:00 | 05:36 -01:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 04:33 | 04:51 -00:02 | 05:36 -01:03 |
| Running 2 | 06:08 | 09:22 | 06:15 -00:07 | 10:27 -01:05 |
| Sled Push | 04:31 | 15:30 | 03:47 +00:44 | 16:42 -01:12 |
| Running 3 | 06:33 | 20:01 | 06:59 -00:26 | 20:29 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 09:29 | 26:34 | 06:38 +02:51 | 27:28 -00:54 |
| Running 4 | 06:44 | 36:03 | 06:56 -00:12 | 34:06 +01:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:17 | 42:47 | 07:57 +00:20 | 41:02 +01:45 |
| Running 5 | 07:09 | 51:04 | 07:20 -00:11 | 48:59 +02:05 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 58:13 | 05:25 +00:01 | 56:19 +01:54 |
| Running 6 | 06:35 | 01:03:39 | 07:01 -00:26 | 01:01:44 +01:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:22 | 01:10:14 | 02:51 +00:31 | 01:08:45 +01:29 |
| Running 7 | 06:53 | 01:13:36 | 07:03 -00:10 | 01:11:36 +02:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:53 | 01:20:29 | 07:17 -01:24 | 01:18:39 +01:50 |
| Running 8 | 07:31 | 01:26:22 | 08:50 -01:19 | 01:25:56 +00:26 |
| Wall Balls | 12:18 | 01:33:53 | 09:31 +02:47 | 01:34:46 -00:53 |
| Roxzone | 08:58 | 01:55:00 | 10:43 -01:45 | 01:55:00 |
Marc's overall time was 01:55:00, with a total running time of 00:52:03. His total running time was 33 seconds faster than the average for his finish time, indicating that he performed well in the running segments of the race. His best running lap was 00:04:33, which was 46 seconds faster than the average.
In conclusion, Marc White had a solid performance in the HYROX race in London. He demonstrated strengths in the running segments and showed areas for improvement in the wall balls, sled pull, burpees broad jump, and farmers carry segments. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as strength exercises, form corrections, and efficient transitions, Marc can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Manzanilla Prieto Fernando | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:54:59 | |
| Salehi Nasser | 2018 Hamburg | 01:54:35 | |
| Uddin Shaffir | 2024 Glasgow | 01:54:47 | |
| Aneatopoulos Jim | 2024 Melbourne | 01:55:25 | |
| Kerekgyarto Akos | 2022 Berlin | 01:55:20 | |
| Carnevali Michael | 2024 New York | 01:55:24 | |
| Chiu James | 2024 Singapore | 01:54:45 | |
| Shifteh Anthony | 2022 Basel | 01:54:38 | |
| Schulz Andreas | 2022 Hamburg | 01:54:42 | |
| Haug Andrew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:55:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London White Marc | 01:58:40 | |
| 2024 Manchester White Marc, Moore Steve | 01:14:15 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
White Marc
