Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Stegemann Marc's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Stegemann Marc's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Stegemann Marc's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stegemann Marc's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 01:06 | 03:08 to 02:02 | 32.0% |
| Run Total | 00:54 | 42:23 to 41:29 | 26.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:35 | 03:16 to 02:41 | 17.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 06:23 to 06:01 | 10.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 05:06 to 04:48 | 8.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 05:08 to 04:58 | 4.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:01 | 04:37 to 04:36 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Stegemann Marc | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 04:36 -00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 04:29 | 04:26 -00:17 | 04:36 -00:07 |
| Running 2 | 05:05 | 08:38 | 04:56 +00:09 | 09:02 -00:24 |
| Sled Push | 03:16 | 13:43 | 02:53 +00:23 | 13:58 -00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 16:59 | 05:22 +00:03 | 16:51 +00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:37 | 22:24 | 04:55 -00:18 | 22:13 +00:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:26 | 27:01 | 05:20 +00:06 | 27:08 -00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:08 | 32:27 | 05:18 -00:10 | 32:28 -00:01 |
| Running 5 | 05:30 | 37:35 | 05:30 +00:00 | 37:46 -00:11 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 43:05 | 04:49 -00:17 | 43:16 -00:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:27 | 47:37 | 05:22 +00:05 | 48:05 -00:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:08 | 53:04 | 02:11 +00:57 | 53:27 -00:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 56:12 | 05:21 -00:04 | 55:38 +00:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:06 | 01:01:29 | 05:06 +00:00 | 01:00:59 +00:30 |
| Running 8 | 05:46 | 01:06:35 | 05:58 -00:12 | 01:06:05 +00:30 |
| Wall Balls | 06:23 | 01:12:21 | 06:30 -00:07 | 01:12:03 +00:18 |
| Roxzone | 06:45 | 01:25:23 | 06:50 -00:05 | 01:25:23 |
Based on his splits analysis, Marc's best running lap was 00:04:29, which was 00:01 slower than the average time. His running performance was relatively consistent throughout the race, with some segments slightly slower or faster than the average times. However, it is important to note that his overall running time was slower than the average.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested training techniques and exercises, Marc Stegemann can enhance his performance in the Hyrox race. It is important for him to focus on improving his overall fitness, particularly in the areas of running, grip strength, and transition time. With consistent training and dedication, he can continue to improve his rankings and achieve his performance goals.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lindberg Calum | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:35 | |
| Griffis Eli | 2024 New York | 01:25:19 | |
| Paul Dulac Paul | 2023 Paris | 01:25:47 | |
| Venter Justin | 2024 Sydney | 01:25:52 | |
| Dijkstra Jurjen | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:25:44 | |
| Whittingslow Sam | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:19 | |
| Clarke Simon | 2024 Dublin | 01:25:28 | |
| Davis Brian | 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:51 | |
| Mather Will | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:25:38 | |
| Smith Harry | 2022 London | 01:25:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Hamburg | 01:30:03 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
