Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Den Berg Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Den Berg Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Den Berg Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Den Berg Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:39 | 49:56 to 44:17 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:11 to 06:11 | 0.0% |
| Van Den Berg Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:13 | 00:00 | 04:46 +00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 05:13 | 04:33 -00:24 | 04:46 +00:27 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 09:22 | 05:15 -00:03 | 09:19 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 14:34 | 03:07 -00:42 | 14:34 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 06:31 | 16:59 | 05:45 +00:46 | 17:41 -00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 03:52 | 23:30 | 05:20 -01:28 | 23:26 +00:04 |
| Running 4 | 06:37 | 27:22 | 05:44 +00:53 | 28:46 -01:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:18 | 33:59 | 05:56 -01:38 | 34:30 -00:31 |
| Running 5 | 06:41 | 38:17 | 05:55 +00:46 | 40:26 -02:09 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 44:58 | 04:57 -00:14 | 46:21 -01:23 |
| Running 6 | 06:04 | 49:41 | 05:44 +00:20 | 51:18 -01:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 55:45 | 02:20 -00:13 | 57:02 -01:17 |
| Running 7 | 06:04 | 57:52 | 05:43 +00:21 | 59:22 -01:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:17 | 01:03:56 | 05:33 -00:16 | 01:05:05 -01:09 |
| Running 8 | 07:38 | 01:09:13 | 06:28 +01:10 | 01:10:38 -01:25 |
| Wall Balls | 06:11 | 01:16:51 | 07:11 -01:00 | 01:17:06 -00:15 |
| Roxzone | 08:55 | 01:31:50 | 07:33 +01:22 | 01:31:50 |
Based on the splits analysis, Mark's total running time of 00:49:56 was 06:17 slower than the average. This indicates that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:12 suggests that he has the potential to excel in running and should focus on training his running abilities.
In conclusion, Mark Van Den Berg had a decent performance in the HYROX race in Rotterdam. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on improving his running abilities, particularly his speed and endurance. Additionally, working on his overall fitness and transition time will help him excel in the race. Implementing specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and circuit training, will help him enhance his performance in the identified areas of improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quinn Jonathan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:31:48 | |
| Itzlinger Christian | 2024 Milan | 01:32:16 | |
| Hill Tyla | 2024 Birmingham | 01:31:54 | |
| Gohla Jeanpierre | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:31:46 | |
| Walraven Frederik | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:32:04 | |
| Horne Liam | 2024 Berlin | 01:31:44 | |
| Falter Erwin | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:31:21 | |
| Al Shehhi Amer | 2023 Dubai | 01:31:27 | |
| Auchenbach Nicholas | 2021 Chicago | 01:31:43 | |
| Russcher Jan | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:32:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:38:20 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:20:11 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:08 | |
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:21:58 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:25:14 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:57:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
