Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hill Tyla's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hill Tyla's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hill Tyla's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hill Tyla's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:42 | 06:01 to 05:19 | 25.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:41 | 06:18 to 05:37 | 25.3% |
| Rowing | 00:20 | 05:13 to 04:53 | 12.3% |
| Run Total | 00:18 | 44:35 to 44:17 | 11.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:13 | 05:19 to 05:06 | 8.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:40 to 04:30 | 6.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:10 | 03:09 to 02:59 | 6.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:08 | 06:53 to 06:45 | 4.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Hill Tyla | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:45 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 05:45 | 04:33 +00:07 | 04:47 +00:58 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 10:25 | 05:15 -00:05 | 09:20 +01:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:09 | 15:35 | 03:07 +00:02 | 14:35 +01:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:20 | 18:44 | 05:45 -00:25 | 17:42 +01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 05:19 | 24:04 | 05:21 -00:02 | 23:27 +00:37 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 29:23 | 05:43 -00:14 | 28:48 +00:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:18 | 34:52 | 05:57 +00:21 | 34:31 +00:21 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 41:10 | 05:54 -00:17 | 40:28 +00:42 |
| Rowing | 05:13 | 46:47 | 04:57 +00:16 | 46:22 +00:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 52:00 | 05:44 -00:13 | 51:19 +00:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 57:31 | 02:20 -00:23 | 57:03 +00:28 |
| Running 7 | 05:26 | 59:28 | 05:43 -00:17 | 59:23 +00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:01 | 01:04:54 | 05:33 +00:28 | 01:05:06 -00:12 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:10:55 | 06:28 -00:08 | 01:10:39 +00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 06:53 | 01:17:15 | 07:11 -00:18 | 01:17:07 +00:08 |
| Roxzone | 07:54 | 01:31:54 | 07:36 +00:18 | 01:31:54 |
Tyla Hill had a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. His overall rank was in the top 44% of 4107 athletes, placing 1820 overall. In his age group (25-29), he scored in the top 47% of 672 athletes, ranking 316. Given the competitive field, these results reflect his strong athletic abilities.
In terms of pacing, Tyla was generally faster in the later running segments. This indicates that he might have started too slow in Running 1, as his time was 01:01 slower than the average. However, he managed to pick up his pace significantly in the subsequent running segments, ultimately resulting in a total running time that was 00:59 faster than average.
Regarding his athletic profile, Tyla leans more towards a running profile as evidenced by his faster total running time. However, his performance in strength-based segments was also respectable, suggesting that he has a hybrid profile.
Based on Tyla's performance, here are some strategies that he could implement in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiel Goncalo | 2023 London | 01:31:43 | |
| Haus Joe | 2023 Houston | 01:32:07 | |
| Capra Ryan | 2024 Houston | 01:32:01 | |
| Keung Victor | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:31:40 | |
| Bourdim Jamel | 2024 Marseille | 01:32:10 | |
| Browne Conor | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:32:22 | |
| Montigny Pierre | 2022 Hamburg | 01:31:42 | |
| Steele Chris | 2023 London | 01:32:13 | |
| Luna Cristiano | 2023 Bilbao | 01:32:05 | |
| Fruci Francesco | 2024 Turin | 01:32:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:49:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
