Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Plante Joe's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Plante Joe's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Plante Joe's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Plante Joe's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:27 | 06:04 to 04:37 | 49.7% |
| Run Total | 00:51 | 41:20 to 40:29 | 29.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:31 | 05:14 to 04:43 | 17.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:06 | 05:51 to 05:45 | 3.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:17 to 02:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Plante Joe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:45 | 00:00 | 04:29 -00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 03:45 | 04:24 -00:09 | 04:29 -00:44 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 08:00 | 04:51 -00:01 | 08:53 -00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:17 | 12:50 | 02:51 -00:34 | 13:44 -00:54 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 15:07 | 05:15 +00:00 | 16:35 -01:28 |
| Sled Pull | 04:12 | 20:22 | 04:45 -00:33 | 21:50 -01:28 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 24:34 | 05:13 +00:16 | 26:35 -02:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:14 | 30:03 | 05:02 +00:12 | 31:48 -01:45 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 35:17 | 05:23 +00:01 | 36:50 -01:33 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 40:41 | 04:45 -00:10 | 42:13 -01:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 45:16 | 05:16 +00:15 | 46:58 -01:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 50:47 | 02:08 -00:18 | 52:14 -01:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:18 | 52:37 | 05:15 +00:03 | 54:22 -01:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:04 | 57:55 | 04:53 +01:11 | 59:37 -01:42 |
| Running 8 | 05:52 | 01:03:59 | 05:46 +00:06 | 01:04:30 -00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 05:51 | 01:09:51 | 06:15 -00:24 | 01:10:16 -00:25 |
| Roxzone | 07:28 | 01:23:00 | 06:29 +00:59 | 01:23:00 |
Joe Plante showcased a commendable performance, securing a place in the top 21% of athletes and ranking in the top 18% of his age category. His total running time was 21 seconds faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. This factor played a significant role in his overall time of 01:23:00. However, his performance showed a drop in the later running segments, suggesting that he began the race on a faster pace which may have affected his energy reserves. His Roxzone time was notably slower than average, indicating a need for better transition and recovery strategies between exercises.
For better race performance, Joe should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yeung Daniel | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:22:57 | |
| Fischer Niklas | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:22:37 | |
| Studniarz Michal | 2024 Katowice | 01:22:35 | |
| Wagner Raphael Tobias Benedikt | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:22:33 | |
| Steinke Daniel | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:22:57 | |
| Ritter Alexander | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:23:08 | |
| Machielse Nick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:35 | |
| Donaghy Richard | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:59 | |
| Van Der Meer Tobias | 2024 London | 01:22:53 | |
| Bleimschein Benedict | 2018 Wien | 01:22:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 New York | 01:20:30 | |
| 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:28:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
