Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pellegrino Gianmarco's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pellegrino Gianmarco's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pellegrino Gianmarco's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pellegrino Gianmarco's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:54 | 05:48 to 04:54 | 31.0% |
| Run Total | 00:51 | 44:02 to 43:11 | 29.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:33 | 07:01 to 06:28 | 19.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:31 | 03:23 to 02:52 | 17.8% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:54 to 04:49 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Pellegrino Gianmarco | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:21 | 00:00 | 04:47 -00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 04:21 | 04:30 -00:04 | 04:47 -00:26 |
| Running 2 | 05:15 | 08:47 | 05:06 +00:09 | 09:17 -00:30 |
| Sled Push | 03:23 | 14:02 | 03:02 +00:21 | 14:23 -00:21 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 17:25 | 05:34 +00:04 | 17:25 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 05:48 | 23:03 | 05:12 +00:36 | 22:59 +00:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:40 | 28:51 | 05:33 +00:07 | 28:11 +00:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:08 | 34:31 | 05:42 -00:34 | 33:44 +00:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:43 | 39:39 | 05:44 -00:01 | 39:26 +00:13 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 45:22 | 04:53 +00:01 | 45:10 +00:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 50:16 | 05:34 +00:06 | 50:03 +00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 55:56 | 02:17 -00:10 | 55:37 +00:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:34 | 58:03 | 05:33 +00:01 | 57:54 +00:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:28 | 01:03:37 | 05:25 -00:57 | 01:03:27 +00:10 |
| Running 8 | 06:16 | 01:08:05 | 06:15 +00:01 | 01:08:52 -00:47 |
| Wall Balls | 07:01 | 01:14:21 | 06:54 +00:07 | 01:15:07 -00:46 |
| Roxzone | 08:10 | 01:29:21 | 07:20 +00:50 | 01:29:21 |
It is worth noting that Gianmarco Pellegrino performed exceptionally well in the running 1 and burpees broad jump segments, where he was significantly faster than the average. This suggests that he has a strong running ability and good explosive power. However, he struggled in the running 2, sled pull, and roxzone segments, where he was slower than the average.
In conclusion, Gianmarco Pellegrino had a strong performance in the 2023 Milan Hyrox race. While he excelled in certain segments, there are areas for improvement, such as running 2, sled pull, and roxzone. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can enhance his performance in these areas and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lachowicz Paweł | 2024 Poznan | 01:29:49 | |
| Jansen Sven | 2024 Maastricht | 01:29:33 | |
| Wall Lachlan | 2024 Sydney | 01:29:07 | |
| Oehri Christopher | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:29:30 | |
| Micallef Brian | 2024 Dublin | 01:29:19 | |
| Foo Derrick | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:29:09 | |
| Harrison Paul | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:44 | |
| Löhe Max | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:29:00 | |
| Tromans Josh | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:42 | |
| Zwijsen Tim | 2024 Maastricht | 01:29:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
