Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lazarski Chris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lazarski Chris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lazarski Chris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lazarski Chris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:28 | 06:57 to 05:29 | 36.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:12 | 06:12 to 05:00 | 30.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:44 | 05:57 to 05:13 | 18.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 03:21 to 02:56 | 10.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 | 06:47 to 06:36 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:40 to 01:40 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:10 to 42:10 | 0.0% |
| Lazarski Chris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:57 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 03:57 | 04:31 -00:07 | 04:46 -00:49 |
| Running 2 | 05:14 | 08:21 | 05:08 +00:06 | 09:17 -00:56 |
| Sled Push | 03:21 | 13:35 | 03:04 +00:17 | 14:25 -00:50 |
| Running 3 | 05:39 | 16:56 | 05:37 +00:02 | 17:29 -00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 06:12 | 22:35 | 05:14 +00:58 | 23:06 -00:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:22 | 28:47 | 05:36 -00:14 | 28:20 +00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:57 | 34:09 | 05:45 +01:12 | 33:56 +00:13 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 41:06 | 05:47 -00:14 | 39:41 +01:25 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 46:39 | 04:54 -00:11 | 45:28 +01:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:29 | 51:22 | 05:37 -00:08 | 50:22 +01:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:40 | 56:51 | 02:17 -00:37 | 55:59 +00:52 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 58:31 | 05:36 -00:17 | 58:16 +00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:57 | 01:03:50 | 05:28 +00:29 | 01:03:52 -00:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:40 | 01:09:47 | 06:18 -00:38 | 01:09:20 +00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 06:47 | 01:15:27 | 06:57 -00:10 | 01:15:38 -00:11 |
| Roxzone | 07:55 | 01:30:01 | 07:26 +00:29 | 01:30:01 |
Chris Lazarski has shown a strong performance, ranking in the top 31% overall and top 35% in his age group. His total running time came in 02:27 faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. He started the race at a faster pace compared to the average, with his first run segment being 00:47 faster than average. This implies a good level of fitness and a well-executed race strategy. However, a slower Roxzone time indicates a need for better transition management and overall fitness improvement.
Several segments stand out for improvement. These include:
For future races, Chris should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Barrie Tejan | 2024 Paris | 01:30:18 | |
| Kers Richard | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:32 | |
| Perez Robert | 2024 Dallas | 01:29:38 | |
| Winsley Rob | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:18 | |
| Cooper Michael | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:49 | |
| Thomas Gareth | 2023 Singapore | 01:29:55 | |
| Luchmun Kevin | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:47 | |
| Nixon Dan | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:22 | |
| Decicco Michael | 2024 New York | 01:30:27 | |
| Pritchards Tom | 2024 Brisbane | 01:30:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Chicago | 01:33:41 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
