Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire George Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights George Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the George Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve George Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:24 | 52:24 to 47:00 | 85.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:24 | 06:00 to 05:36 | 6.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:46 to 02:26 | 5.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 03:26 to 03:17 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:53 to 05:53 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:42 to 05:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:49 to 06:49 | 0.0% |
| George Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 05:03 -00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 04:57 | 04:38 -00:27 | 05:03 -00:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 09:08 | 05:30 -00:20 | 09:41 -00:33 |
| Sled Push | 03:26 | 14:18 | 03:17 +00:09 | 15:11 -00:53 |
| Running 3 | 06:21 | 17:44 | 06:01 +00:20 | 18:28 -00:44 |
| Sled Pull | 06:00 | 24:05 | 05:45 +00:15 | 24:29 -00:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:58 | 30:05 | 06:01 -00:03 | 30:14 -00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:53 | 36:03 | 06:29 -00:36 | 36:15 -00:12 |
| Running 5 | 06:27 | 41:56 | 06:16 +00:11 | 42:44 -00:48 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 48:23 | 05:07 -00:17 | 49:00 -00:37 |
| Running 6 | 06:22 | 53:13 | 06:04 +00:18 | 54:07 -00:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:46 | 59:35 | 02:27 +00:19 | 01:00:11 -00:36 |
| Running 7 | 08:47 | 01:02:21 | 06:04 +02:43 | 01:02:38 -00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:42 | 01:11:08 | 06:04 -00:22 | 01:08:42 +02:26 |
| Running 8 | 08:27 | 01:16:50 | 07:01 +01:26 | 01:14:46 +02:04 |
| Wall Balls | 06:49 | 01:25:17 | 07:51 -01:02 | 01:21:47 +03:30 |
| Roxzone | 06:04 | 01:38:01 | 08:23 -02:19 | 01:38:01 |
Daniel's total running time of 00:52:24 was 06:21 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and working on his transition time between exercises. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:04:57 indicates that he has some potential as a runner and could focus on developing his running skills further.
Overall, Daniel George has shown potential as a runner and has performed well in certain segments of the race. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, running technique, and addressing his weaker segments, he can enhance his performance in future races. Incorporating the suggested training strategies, exercises, and race strategies will help him become a stronger and more well-rounded athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schuberth Michael | 2024 Berlin | 01:37:44 | |
| Koczwara Radosław | 2023 Warschau | 01:38:12 | |
| Guilbert Maxence | 2023 Paris | 01:38:24 | |
| Krajniak Jarosaw | 2023 Warschau | 01:37:36 | |
| Larson Colton | 2024 Singapore | 01:38:22 | |
| Balagtas Adrian | 2024 Sydney | 01:38:28 | |
| Jones Aiden | 2024 Glasgow | 01:38:14 | |
| Lecke Manuel | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:38:13 | |
| Elliott Stephen | 2020 Dallas | 01:38:15 | |
| Niessen Philipp | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:38:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:40:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
