Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Guln David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Guln David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Guln David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Guln David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:04 | 47:21 to 44:17 | 64.1% |
| Sled Pull | 01:03 | 06:09 to 05:06 | 22.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:22 | 04:52 to 04:30 | 7.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:18 | 03:17 to 02:59 | 6.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:30 to 05:30 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:17 to 06:17 | 0.0% |
| Guln David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:23 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 05:23 | 04:32 +00:20 | 04:47 +00:36 |
| Running 2 | 05:36 | 10:15 | 05:14 +00:22 | 09:19 +00:56 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 15:51 | 03:06 +00:11 | 14:33 +01:18 |
| Running 3 | 06:20 | 19:08 | 05:43 +00:37 | 17:39 +01:29 |
| Sled Pull | 06:09 | 25:28 | 05:19 +00:50 | 23:22 +02:06 |
| Running 4 | 06:13 | 31:37 | 05:41 +00:32 | 28:41 +02:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 37:50 | 05:53 -00:23 | 34:22 +03:28 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 43:20 | 05:53 +00:10 | 40:15 +03:05 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 49:23 | 04:57 -00:04 | 46:08 +03:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 54:16 | 05:43 +00:06 | 51:05 +03:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 01:00:05 | 02:19 -00:08 | 56:48 +03:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 01:02:16 | 05:42 -00:02 | 59:07 +03:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:08 | 01:07:56 | 05:32 -01:24 | 01:04:49 +03:07 |
| Running 8 | 06:21 | 01:12:04 | 06:27 -00:06 | 01:10:21 +01:43 |
| Wall Balls | 06:17 | 01:18:25 | 07:10 -00:53 | 01:16:48 +01:37 |
| Roxzone | 07:00 | 01:31:33 | 07:35 -00:35 | 01:31:33 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is clear that David struggled in the running segments, particularly Running 1, Running 3, Running 4, and Running 2. These segments were all slower than the average, indicating that he needs to focus on improving his running speed and efficiency. Additionally, his Total running time was 03:37 slower than average, suggesting that he may need to improve his overall fitness and transition time.
Additionally, David should prioritize his transitions between exercise zones (Roxzone). By improving his overall fitness and transition time, he can minimize the time spent in these zones and optimize his overall race performance.
In conclusion, David Guln performed well in the Hyrox race in Stuttgart, but there are areas for improvement to enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his running speed and efficiency, incorporating interval training and speed work, and prioritizing his transitions, he can make significant progress in his future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maughan Tom | 2024 Dublin | 01:32:03 | |
| Davis Kieron | 2023 Manchester | 01:31:32 | |
| Green Ethan | 2024 Berlin | 01:31:30 | |
| Delahunt Danny | 2023 London | 01:31:48 | |
| Klatt Thorsten | 2022 Bremen | 01:31:52 | |
| King Páidí | 2024 London | 01:31:05 | |
| Rankin Erik | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:31:12 | |
| Scheuermann Max | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:31:53 | |
| Sobala Dawid | 2019 Hamburg | 01:31:15 | |
| Aro Arran | 2024 Birmingham | 01:32:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:29:31 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
