Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Labee Jochem's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Labee Jochem's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Labee Jochem's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Labee Jochem's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:37 | 49:52 to 45:15 | 81.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:25 | 04:58 to 04:33 | 7.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:23 | 07:25 to 07:02 | 6.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:13 | 06:04 to 05:51 | 3.8% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:01 to 04:57 | 1.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:54 to 02:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:17 to 02:17 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Labee Jochem | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:17 | 00:00 | 04:52 -00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:58 | 04:17 | 04:33 +00:25 | 04:52 -00:35 |
| Running 2 | 05:44 | 09:15 | 05:20 +00:24 | 09:25 -00:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 14:59 | 03:11 -00:17 | 14:45 +00:14 |
| Running 3 | 06:37 | 17:53 | 05:50 +00:47 | 17:56 -00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 24:30 | 05:29 -00:35 | 23:46 +00:44 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 29:24 | 05:49 +00:27 | 29:15 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:04 | 35:40 | 06:07 -00:03 | 35:04 +00:36 |
| Running 5 | 06:42 | 41:44 | 06:02 +00:40 | 41:11 +00:33 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 48:26 | 04:59 +00:02 | 47:13 +01:13 |
| Running 6 | 06:26 | 53:27 | 05:51 +00:35 | 52:12 +01:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 59:53 | 02:22 -00:05 | 58:03 +01:50 |
| Running 7 | 06:29 | 01:02:10 | 05:50 +00:39 | 01:00:25 +01:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:11 | 01:08:39 | 05:41 -01:30 | 01:06:15 +02:24 |
| Running 8 | 07:24 | 01:12:50 | 06:38 +00:46 | 01:11:56 +00:54 |
| Wall Balls | 07:25 | 01:20:14 | 07:26 -00:01 | 01:18:34 +01:40 |
| Roxzone | 06:23 | 01:33:54 | 07:54 -01:31 | 01:33:54 |
Jochem Labee delivered a commendable performance, securing a top 48% finish among 3,118 athletes in the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX event. His overall time was 01:33:54, with a total running time of 00:49:52, which was 03:14 slower than the average. This suggests that while Jochem shows a solid strength profile, particularly with exercises like the Sandbag Lunges where he was significantly faster than average, there is considerable room for improvement in running. The initial fast pace he set in Running 1 indicates a strong start, but the subsequent decline suggests he may have started too fast, leading to slower times in later running segments. Jochem appears to be more adept at strength-focused challenges, highlighting the need for balanced training to enhance his running capabilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conway Noel | 2024 Dublin | 01:33:56 | |
| Liebscher Tom | 2019 Hamburg | 01:33:31 | |
| Malley Charlie | 2023 Melbourne | 01:34:00 | |
| Lauderdale Kyle | 2023 Chicago | 01:34:23 | |
| Allan Scott | 2022 London | 01:33:28 | |
| Valentukonis Povilas | 2024 Malaga | 01:34:08 | |
| Johnson Adrian | 2024 Brisbane | 01:34:17 | |
| Boyce Jan | 2022 London | 01:33:36 | |
| Hogenes Harmen | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:33:30 | |
| Loogman Andre | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:33:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
