Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 794 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ingardia Frank's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ingardia Frank's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ingardia Frank's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ingardia Frank's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:03 | 09:25 to 07:22 | 36.8% |
| Run Total | 01:30 | 53:07 to 51:37 | 26.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:25 | 08:12 to 06:47 | 25.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:36 | 03:23 to 02:47 | 10.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:08 to 06:08 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:32 to 08:32 | 0.0% |
| Ingardia Frank | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:19 | 00:00 | 05:25 +00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 06:19 | 04:47 -00:10 | 05:25 +00:54 |
| Running 2 | 06:16 | 10:56 | 05:59 +00:17 | 10:12 +00:44 |
| Sled Push | 02:00 | 17:12 | 03:43 -01:43 | 16:11 +01:01 |
| Running 3 | 06:15 | 19:12 | 06:39 -00:24 | 19:54 -00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 06:08 | 25:27 | 06:30 -00:22 | 26:33 -01:06 |
| Running 4 | 06:25 | 31:35 | 06:40 -00:15 | 33:03 -01:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:25 | 38:00 | 07:28 +01:57 | 39:43 -01:43 |
| Running 5 | 06:51 | 47:25 | 06:59 -00:08 | 47:11 +00:14 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 54:16 | 05:20 -00:21 | 54:10 +00:06 |
| Running 6 | 06:47 | 59:15 | 06:43 +00:04 | 59:30 -00:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:23 | 01:06:02 | 02:48 +00:35 | 01:06:13 -00:11 |
| Running 7 | 06:35 | 01:09:25 | 06:46 -00:11 | 01:09:01 +00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:12 | 01:16:00 | 06:59 +01:13 | 01:15:47 +00:13 |
| Running 8 | 07:42 | 01:24:12 | 08:14 -00:32 | 01:22:46 +01:26 |
| Wall Balls | 08:32 | 01:31:54 | 09:08 -00:36 | 01:31:00 +00:54 |
| Roxzone | 09:46 | 01:50:05 | 09:57 -00:11 | 01:50:05 |
Frank Ingardia completed the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race with an overall time of 01:50:05, ranking him at 1021st place overall and 164th in his age group. His total running time was faster than the average by 00:47, indicating a strong running capability. Frank's best running lap was 00:06:15, showcasing his potential in running segments. However, his initial running segments (Running 1 and Running 2) were slower than average, suggesting a slightly conservative start. Overall, Frank displays a hybrid profile with a stronger leaning towards running efficiency. His performance in strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push was exceptional, while areas such as the Burpees Broad Jump and Sandbag Lunges showed room for improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fu Darren | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:49:37 | |
| Preß Lukas | 2024 Hamburg | 01:49:48 | |
| Cuenca Fabian | 2021 Madrid | 01:49:42 | |
| Clines Jack | 2022 Chicago | 01:50:09 | |
| Ross Iain | 2023 Glasgow | 01:50:04 | |
| Calva Tapia Tapita | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:49:48 | |
| Geißler Christopher | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:49:39 | |
| Wiencek Michael | 2024 London | 01:50:33 | |
| Hemming Adam | 2023 Dublin | 01:50:33 | |
| Lewis George | 2023 Birmingham | 01:49:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sydney | 01:46:49 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
