Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Los Angeles using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 387 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Busby James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Busby James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Busby James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Busby James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:15 | 01:00:06 to 54:51 | 62.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:48 | 08:50 to 07:02 | 21.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:43 | 05:40 to 04:57 | 8.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:30 | 04:39 to 04:09 | 5.9% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:41 to 05:29 | 2.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:46 to 07:46 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 07:19 to 07:19 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:08 to 08:08 | 0.0% |
| Busby James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:06 | 00:00 | 05:55 +01:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:40 | 07:06 | 04:57 +00:43 | 05:55 +01:11 |
| Running 2 | 06:53 | 12:46 | 06:24 +00:29 | 10:52 +01:54 |
| Sled Push | 04:39 | 19:39 | 04:02 +00:37 | 17:16 +02:23 |
| Running 3 | 07:49 | 24:18 | 07:14 +00:35 | 21:18 +03:00 |
| Sled Pull | 08:50 | 32:07 | 07:12 +01:38 | 28:32 +03:35 |
| Running 4 | 07:29 | 40:57 | 07:14 +00:15 | 35:44 +05:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:46 | 48:26 | 08:27 -00:41 | 42:58 +05:28 |
| Running 5 | 07:37 | 56:12 | 07:43 -00:06 | 51:25 +04:47 |
| Rowing | 05:41 | 01:03:49 | 05:33 +00:08 | 59:08 +04:41 |
| Running 6 | 07:01 | 01:09:30 | 07:23 -00:22 | 01:04:41 +04:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:31 | 01:16:31 | 02:57 -00:26 | 01:12:04 +04:27 |
| Running 7 | 07:06 | 01:19:02 | 07:23 -00:17 | 01:15:01 +04:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:19 | 01:26:08 | 07:51 -00:32 | 01:22:24 +03:44 |
| Running 8 | 09:08 | 01:33:27 | 09:28 -00:20 | 01:30:15 +03:12 |
| Wall Balls | 08:08 | 01:42:35 | 10:17 -02:09 | 01:39:43 +02:52 |
| Roxzone | 10:41 | 02:01:16 | 11:16 -00:35 | 02:01:16 |
In terms of his splits analysis, James showed consistent performance throughout the race. His total running time was 01:00:06, which was 04:29 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time. His best running lap was 00:06:53, showing a strong pace and endurance.
Additionally, James should work on his transition time in the roxzone. By improving his overall fitness and minimizing the time spent in the transition, he can gain an advantage over his competitors.
To enhance his performance in compromised running scenarios, James should incorporate strength training exercises that mimic running movements, such as resistance band running drills and sled pushes. These exercises will help improve his running form and strength, allowing him to perform better in challenging running segments.
Overall, James Busby has shown solid performance in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running speed, endurance, and transition time, he can further enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moran John | 2024 Singapore | 02:00:55 | |
| Carré Thibault | 2024 Marseille | 02:01:13 | |
| Mcconnell Luke | 2024 Brisbane | 02:01:26 | |
| OCHOA RUDY | 2023 Dallas | 02:01:19 | |
| Kolde Thomas | 2019 Oberhausen | 02:01:44 | |
| Rouse Leigh | 2024 Birmingham | 02:01:24 | |
| Atherton Eric | 2022 Dallas | 02:01:33 | |
| Mcdonald Josh | 2022 London | 02:00:55 | |
| Kornek Patrick | 2024 Hamburg | 02:00:48 | |
| Ijalba Martinez Javier | 2022 Valencia | 02:01:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
