Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Hateley Owen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hateley Owen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hateley Owen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hateley Owen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
06:40.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Owen Hateley delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Milan Hyrox race, ranking in the top 62% overall and top 61% within his age group. His overall time was 01:35:10, with an impressive total running time of 00:41:06, which is notably 06:02 faster than the average. This indicates that Owen has a strong runner's profile. However, his performance in strength-based exercises such as the Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, and Wall Balls indicates room for improvement in these areas. Owen's pacing strategy was effective as his running times improved as the race progressed, showing an ability to maintain and even increase speed, particularly in later stages like Running 6, 7, and 8.
Segments to Improve
Sled Pull: Owen’s time was significantly slower than average. To improve, focus on building upper body and core strength. Training Strategies: Incorporate sled pull workouts with increasing resistance, engage in deadlifts, bent-over rows, and core stability exercises.
Roxzone: Time spent in the roxzone was slower than average, suggesting prolonged transitions. Training Strategies: Practice transition drills to minimize downtime and improve efficiency. Focus on cardiovascular conditioning to reduce recovery time.
Burpees Broad Jump: This segment also posed a challenge. Training Strategies: Perform burpees with a focus on explosive power and combine them with plyometric exercises like box jumps to enhance leg strength and power.
Wall Balls: This segment was slower than average. Training Strategies: Improve leg and shoulder endurance with wall ball drills, squats, and overhead presses. Focus on increasing the efficiency of each throw.
Rowing: Owen’s performance was below average. Training Strategies: Focus on rowing technique to increase power per stroke. Implement interval training on the rowing machine to boost cardiovascular endurance and stroke efficiency.
Race Strategies
Optimize Transitions: Work on reducing transition times with specific drills aimed at quick and efficient movement between exercise zones.
Enhanced Pacing: Continue to leverage strong running capabilities by maintaining a consistent pace, especially in early segments, to conserve energy for strength exercises.
Strength and Conditioning Balance: Focus on a balanced training plan that enhances both running endurance and strength, particularly in exercises where performance was lagging.
Compromised Running Scenarios: Simulate race conditions by performing strength exercises immediately followed by running drills to adapt to the fatigue and transition demands of the race.